Cliquez ici >>> 🪩 doctor who revolution of the daleks streaming vf

Kandu se doctor-who-revolution-of-the-daleks-2021 med en streamingtjeneste? Vi sammenligner Disney+, Netflix og Amazon Prime Video for at vise dig de bedste steder til at streame doctor-who-revolution-of-the-daleks-2021. Find ud af hvor du skal se den online og stream doctor-who-revolution-of-the-daleks-2021 med en gratis prøveperiode i dag. StreamingTrailers DVD VOD Kids (2005) - saison 12 Bande-annonce VO "Revolution of the Daleks" 11 060 vues - Il y a 1 an. 1:00 . Doctor Who (2005) - saison 12 Bande-annonce (2) VO. 5 510 vues FilmRevolution Of Our Times Streaming Vf, Streaming avec sous-titres en Français, revolution of Regardez tout le film sans limitation, diffusez en streaming en qualité . Film Revolution Of Our Times Streaming Vf, Streaming avec sous-titres en Français. Breathing Together: Revolution of the Electric Family Titre original: Breathing Together: Revolution of the Electric Family ( Film WatchDoctor Who Season 12 Episode 9. "Ascension of the Cybermen". Original Air Date: February 23, 2020. On Doctor Who Season 12 Episode 9, in the future, the Doctor and friends face a brutal Épisodeprécédent S12E11 - Revolution of the Daleks Numéro S13E01 Pays Royaume-Uni; Genres Aventure, Drame, Science-fiction Russell T Davies reviendra officiellement en 2023 pour mener Doctor Who vers de nouvelles aventures. 29 septembre 2021. Les séries à ne pas rater en septembre. 31 août 2021. Doctor Who : Jodie Whittaker quittera la série après la Comment Faire Des Rencontres Dans Une Nouvelle Ville. Doctor Who fans have been through it this months of no news about any sort of holiday special, confusion over whether or not we’d even see one at all thanks to the coronavirus pandemic, and news that the … How can you fight a Dalek without the Doctor… firewalkwithmee folgen Dalek casings are there being 3D printed in the … Be sure to keep a look out for my short review on my page I think Jodie is doing just fine but Chris Chibnall is letting her down with the stories and scripts. The Doctor … Yaz volunteers, and the Doctor confirms that Robertson has recently open a facility in Osaka The Doctor materialized the TARDIS in Robertson's office, comes out, and warns him that he's out of his depth if he's dealing with Daleks. As for Revolution, too much Fam time and not enough on the Doctor. Revolution of the Daleks continues directly from the cliff-hanger ending of series 12, The Timeless Children, which saw the Doctor captured by the Judoon, who pulled her out of … Old habits die hard. Der Artikel Doctor Who Captain Jack im Teaser zu Revolution of the Daleks wurde von Mario Giglio am Dienstag, den 24. Staffel. The Doctor is locked away in a high-security alien prison. Hello! Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks French Stream VF – Voir Film Streaming Complet en Streaming FR, Stream FR Film Gratuit. Doctor Who - Revolution of the Daleks Trailer zum Neujahrsspecial Am 1. But one of the Daleks’ inner creatures has escaped and takes over a human body to genetically engineer new Daleks to be … This year’s holiday special for Doctor Who aired on Friday, January 1 st and it found the Doctor Jodie Whittaker locked away in a high-security alien prison with no hope of escape. Doctor Who Revolution Of The Daleks. Email; Copy link; The Doctor is locked away in a high-security alien prison. Doctor who revolution of the daleks premieres on bbc America at 800. Der Doctor ist in einem außerirdischen Hochsicherheitsgefängnis eingesperrt. Hero Collector’s Revolution of the Daleks Figurine Box Set features three hand-painted polyresin figurines at 121 scale approximately inches … Revolution of the Daleks will not be on the rewatch list, although I can’t think of any with Jodie Whittaker that I would rewatch. Revolution of the Daleks ist die 324. Revolution of the Daleks’ is a direct sequel to the 2019 holiday special, “ Resolution … Summary The Doctor is a Time Lord a 900 year old alien with 2 hearts, part of a gifted civilization who mastered time Doctor saves planets for a living—more of a hobby actually, and the Doctor’s very, very good at it. Jodie Whittaker returns for her second New Year’s Day outing and her second time facing down the eye stalks of the Daleks. Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks. Yaz Mandip Gil, Ryan Tosin Cole and Graham Bradley Walsh are far away on Earth and having to carry on with their lives without her. ⚜ — Official~Watch Streaming !! Isolated, alone, with no hope of escape. Regarder Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks film complet enligne gratuit Regardez un film en ligne à travers les meilleures vidéos HD 1080p gratuites sur ordinateur de bureau, ordinateur portable, ordinateur portable, tablette, iPhone, iPad, Mac Pro et plus encore. At long last, Doctor Who festive special “Revolution of the Daleks” is almost how fans can watch the new episode on New Year’s Day. In the festive special, Yaz, Ryan and Graham are far away on Earth and discover a disturbing plan involving the Daleks. Share. Directed by James Strong. The New Year’s Special of Doctor Who aired on BBC and BBC America on January 1 st and comes with great dialogue, snarky comments, and memorable quotes. It’s a special’ in every sense of the word which I hope … “Revolution of the Daleks is an emotional rollercoaster full of action, tension, old friends, old enemies and some heartfelt goodbyes, all of which are accompanied by music that utilises many of the musical themes from Series 11 and Series 12, and very often moves from a solo cello to orchestra, and much more in-between. With David Tennant, Freema Agyeman, Miranda Raison, Ryan Carnes. Jack Robinson aka spider guy is trying to make Britain better again by capitalizing on using Dalek shells as anti-riot security drones. Revolution of the Daleks was the 2021 New Year Special of Doctor Who. Faced with the cyborgs' most evil and dangerous scheme yet, will the Doctor and Martha be able to defeat their greatest opponents? „ Revolution of the Daleks “-Trailer Der Artikel Doctor Who Trailer kündigt Special für Neujahr an wurde von Mario Giglio am Montag, den 30. Continuing the Recon Dalek storyline that … Comparamos Disney+, Netflix e Amazon Prime Video para lhe mostrar o melhor lugar para transmitir Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks. AKA Доктор Хто, Doctor Who, Doctor Who Christmas Special 2011, Dr. Who, The Haunting of Villa Diodati Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks is a one-off holiday special premiering Friday, January 1 at 8 ET/PT on BBC America.. A plan which involves a Dalek. It featured the return of Jack Harkness, and marked the Thirteenth Doctor's reunion with her companions following the events of TV The Timeless Children. The Doctor is locked away in a high-security alien prison. First Air Date 2005-03-26 Language English Status Returning Series Type Scripted Genre Action & Adventure, Drama, Sci-Fi & Fantasy Facebook; Twitter; Send this by. Fetching watchlist. As for the so-called “Revolution of the Daleks” plotline itself, we’ve been here before in Doctor Who, sort of. Allein, isoliert, ohne Hoffnung auf Flucht ... Weit weg auf der Erde müssen ihre Freunde Yaz, Ryan und… Descubra onde assistir e transmita Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks com uma avaliação gratuita. 637 PM. The episode is titled 'Revolution of the Daleks,' and it gives the Doctor's greatest foes a brand new look. The BBC has released the trailer for this year's Doctor Who holiday special. Video Share Options Share this on. If you don’t have cable, here’s how you can watch the Doctor … Doctor Who, Revolution of the Daleks,’ Fun Returns & Emotional Departures in an Overstuffed Holiday Episode Photo Credit BBC. Concluding part to Daleks in Manhattan. The 2021 New Year’s Day Special Revolution of the Daleks is available now on Blu-ray.. The episode also saw the departure of Bradley Walsh as Graham O'Brien and Tosin Cole as Ryan Sinclair. Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks streaming complet vf en français. Isolated, alone, with no hope of escape. Doctor Who star Jodie Whittaker discussed "Revolution of the Daleks" and what it was like saying goodbye to Bradley Walsh and Tosin Cole. Meanwhile, her best friends, Yaz, Ryan and Graham, are far away on Earth and having to carry on with their lives without her. The Doctor Who festive special sees the Doctor trapped while her friends battle Daleks - … Revolution of the Daleks With the Doctor imprisoned halfway across the universe, can the return of Captain Jack Harkness help Graham, Yaz and Ryan stop a deadly Dalek … Você pode assistir Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks com um serviço de streaming? In 1930s New York, the Daleks' plan is in full force. Far away, on Earth, her best friends, Yaz, Ryan, and Graham have to pick up their lives without her. Written by Brian McNamara. Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks regarder Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks online gratuit Regardez un film en ligne à travers les meilleures vidéos HD 1080p gratuites sur … After a long wait and plenty of build up, Doctor Who festive special Revolution of the Daleks has finally come and gone, with the 70-minute … Here is a list of the best quotes from Doctor Who “Revolution of the Daleks”.. A little treat for the wizarding fans. ABC TV DRAMA. But it's not easy. November 2020 um Uhr erstmalig veröffentlicht. But how can you fight a Dalek, without the Doctor? Especially when they discover a disturbing plan forming. What's ahead after that game-changing finale? Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks streaming francais. While on Earth they soon … Januar 2021 läuft bei der BBC die Doctor Who -Sonderfolge Revolution of the Daleks an, in der mit Captain Jack Harkness ein alter Bekannter auftaucht und die Daleks sich um … Episode der Serie Doctor Who und beendete als Neujahrsspecial die 38. Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks 2021–01–1 January 1, 2021 — Full SHOW [4KHD Quality] The Doctor is imprisoned halfway across the universe. She demands to know what he's doing, and Robertson cheerfully takes them to his production line. Revolution of the Daleks The Doctor is locked away in a high-security alien prison. Coming soon is a Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks Box Set of figurines from Hero Collector, featuring the Doctor and Captain Jack in their prison garb, and a defence drone Dalek.. Pre-order the Revolution of the Daleks figurine set here. Dais Johnston. Doctor Who The Daleks are revolting in first Revolution of the Daleks trailer. "Doctor Who" Evolution of the Daleks subtitles. Seeing as Doctor Who series 1-12 are on HBO Max, I was wondering, on New Year's, will 'Revolution of the Daleks' be made available on the … Doctor Who Revolution of the Daleks may dive deep into the Doctor's inner life. Isolated, alone, with no hope of escape. Ercole, Sansone, Maciste E Ursus Gli Invincibili Cast, Parker Sonnet France, Ristoranti Lido Fano, Sentimento Religioso Autentico, The Farewell Spietati, Come Si Cucina La Carpa, Frasi Provocanti In Inglese, Eventi Salento Agosto 2020, Ovolo Malefico Ac Valhalla, Concorsi Asl Pescara 2020, L'événement annulé, diffusé habituellement pendant les fêtes, a déjà été tourné. Au moment où toutes les productions télévisées ont fermé en raison de la pandémie, la saison 12 de Doctor Who venait de diffuser le final de sa saison 12. Mais comme à son habitude, le drama britannique va prolonger le plaisir avec un "Holiday Special", un épisode spécial proposé pendant les fêtes de fin d'année. Celui-là s'intitulera Revolution of the Daleks», et il pourra bien être à l'antenne à la date prévue. Steven Moffat de retour pour écrire une nouvelle histoire de Doctor Who En effet, dans une interview avec EW, l'actrice de Doctor Who, Mandip Gill qui joue Yasmin Khan révèle que la production a eu le temps terminer le tournage de cet épisode événement, juste avant le confinement, ce qui signifie qu'il pourra bien être diffusé fin 2020 "Je peux le confirmer. Il y aura un épisode pour les fêtes. Nous avons eu beaucoup de chance et nous sommes parvenus à le finir à temps. Ce sera donc excitant à voir !" En France, Doctor Who est à voir sur France Télévisions. Serial Causeurs est l'un des premiers podcasts français sur les séries TV depuis 2014. De Netflix à Disney+ en passant par les chaînes américaines, les séries pas encore diffusées en France, les pépites, les nullités, on essaye de tout regarder à votre place et de vous faire notre liste de recommandations séries ! On débat en toute modestie et mauvaise foi sur les séries d'hier, d'aujourd'hui et de demain. Entre nouveautés, coup de gueule, série immanquable, Serial Causeurs c'est de la bonne humeur et des séries TV pour tous. 8x14 - Les séries du printemps avec Severance, Pachinko, Moon Knight, Halo Apr 15 2022 56 mins Le printemps est là et les bonnes séries fleurissent ! Au programme, du mystère, des larmes, des armes, des psychodrames, des yoctogrammes, pourquoi pas et du charme, allons bon, avec Fred, Aki, Maxime, Stéphane et Tom 200 fin de Severance sur Apple TV+ 1000 fin de Killing Eve sur Canal+ 1430 From bientôt sur Netflix 2500 Moon Knight sur Disney+ 3140 Pachinko sur Apple TV+ 4130 Halo dès le jeudi 28 avril 2022 sur Canal+ 4430 Parallèles sur Disney+ 4810 Minx sur HBO max 5120 En Thérapie saison sur - Notre compte Twitter pour nous suivre ▶ Les causeurs sur Twitter🔽 Tom smallthingsfr Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Maxime SergeLamaDelRey Maka MaKaTheFrenchie Fred FredMyscreens Hugo HugoClery ▶ Où retrouver le podcast ?🔽 Podcloud iTunes Google Pod Spotify Podmust Castbox Podcast Addict 8x09 - Doctor Who Flux, retour sur la saison 13 et l'avenir de la série Jan 21 2022 53 mins Saison la plus courte avec seulement 6 épisodes, la saison 13 de Doctor Who tend vers une conclusion de l'ère Chibnall, et de Jodie Whittaker. Doctor Who Flux est la saison 13 de Doctor Who, avec le treizième docteur joué par Jodie Whittaker. Elle a été suivie par un téléfilm traditionnellement diffusé au Nouvel An. Il y aura deux autres films pour célébrer le centanaire de la BBC et le retour de Russel T. Davies, showrunner adoré des fans. Davies était à l'origine du retour du Doctor en 2005, joué alors par Christopher Eccleston. Pour faire le point critique sur cette saison, Stéphane, Maxime et Iris se réunissent dans le podcast Serial Causeurs. Au programme, les points forts et les points faibles de cette saison, une projection vers l'avenir et sur l'identité du prochain Doctor. 200 Saison 13 2930 Téléfilm du nouvel an, Eve of the Daleks 4500 A venir en 2022, et spéculations de casting - Notre compte Twitter pour nous suivre ▶ Les causeurs sur Twitter🔽 Tom smallthingsfr Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Maxime SergeLamaDelRey Maka MaKaTheFrenchie Fred FredMyscreens Hugo HugoClery ▶ Où retrouver le podcast ?🔽 Podcloud iTunes Google Pod Spotify Podmust Castbox Podcast Addict 8x07 - Zoey's Extraordinary Christmas, And Just Like That, Dexter et les séries sans fin Dec 17 2021 54 mins Sex and the City est revenu, Zoey's Extraordinary Playlist aussi, Dexter de même, mais pourquoi les revivals sont si présents ? Avec le retour de séries à peine terminée comme Zoey's Extraordinary Playlist ou des retours des années plus tard comme Dexter ou même Nash Bridges, on fait le point sur ces revivals plus ou moins dispensables. 140 Zoey's Extraodinary Christmas 1320 And Just Like That... sur Salto 2640 Dexter New Blood 3010 Nash Bridges 3120 Ray Donovan 3140 Deadwood 3330 Veronica Mars, X-Files, Twin peaks, Timeless, Dead Like Me, Alf, Community et les séries qui devraient ou pas revenir - Notre compte Twitter pour nous suivre ▶ Les causeurs sur Twitter🔽 Tom smallthingsfr Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Maxime SergeLamaDelRey Maka MaKaTheFrenchie Fred FredMyscreens Hugo HugoClery ▶ Où retrouver le podcast ?🔽 Podcloud iTunes Google Pod Spotify Podmust Castbox Podcast Addict 7x25 - Les meilleures séries de la saison avec Monsieur Séries, Series Junkies, Seriespod et 42 Minutes, les déceptions et que voir cet été Jul 02 2021 66 mins Depuis 2012, Smallthings essaye de rendre compte de la saison sérielle à travers un Bilan Collectif qui note les saisons et propose une hiérarchie qualitative. Pour cette 10è édition, gros bouleversement dans la forme de ce bilan oui comme l'année dernière. L’idée de ce bilan était de réunir des sériephiles fidèles pour dresser le portrait de la saison série avec ses hauts et ses bas. Cette année, nouvelle formule avec des podcasts invités ! Serial Causeurs, notre podcast séries, avait pris le relais de ce Bilan Collectif Séries en mettant en avant nos séries favorites de la saison et nos déceptions. On ne déroge pas à la règle cette saison malgré la condition sanitaire qui a bouleversé la diffusion et la production séries. Nos habitudes ont aussi été changeantes. C'est cela que nous nous sommes limités à un TOP 3 des Nouvelles Séries, un TOP 3 des Nouvelles Saisons, un TOP 3 des séries revues ou découvertes et enfin le ou les diffuseurs qui ont marqué notre année. La Team Serial Causeurs avec Maxime, Thomas, Aki, Stéphane sont là. En invités, les podcasts séries 42 Minutes, Monsieur Séries & Friends, Sériespod et Séries Junkies que vous avez pu suivre dans les crossovers de cette saison podcast ! Nous rappelons les règles Les saisons diffusées entre le 1er septembre 2020 et le 31 mai 2021 sont prises en compte avec une marge si la saison est à cheval ou pour raison exceptionnelle Aussi retrouvez en fin de podcast, nos recommandations pour cet été avec plein de séries dont la saison 2 de notre numéro 1 de la saison dernière, Evil ! - Notre compte Twitter pour nous suivre ▶ Les causeurs sur Twitter🔽 Tom smallthingsfr Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Maxime SergeLamaDelRey ▶ Où retrouver le podcast ?🔽 Podcloud iTunes Google Pod Spotify Podmust Castbox Podcast Addict 7x24 - Et après Friends, qu'ont fait les 6 acteurs ? Jun 21 2021 49 mins Le jeudi 24 juin, TF1 diffusera les retrouvailles de Friends en prime-time ! Cette Friends The Reunion était attendue par les fans depuis de nombreuses années. Stéphane, Aki, Maxime et Tom reviennent sur cette réunion disponible sur Salto et s'intéressent à la carrière TV des 6 acteurs !. Au programme, Web Therapy, Dirt, Feed the beast, Mr Sunshine, Joey, Space Force, Cougar Town, Episodes, Studio 60... et les endroits où les revoir ! - Notre compte Twitter pour nous suivre ▶ Les causeurs sur Twitter🔽 Tom smallthingsfr Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Maxime SergeLamaDelRey ▶ Où retrouver le podcast ?🔽 Podcloud iTunes Google Pod Spotify Podmust Castbox Podcast Addict 7x19 - Superstore et les workplace comedies The Office, Parks... Apr 12 2021 53 mins Superstore termine son run après 6 saisons, on revient sur la fin et les workplace comedies en général Le CLoud 9 a fermé ses portes après 6 saisons. La série de NBC a réussi sa saison Covid mais également sa mission de rendre compte de la situation des employés de supermarché aux USA. Souvent pertinente et drôle, Superstore fait désormais partie des workplace comédies qui comptent. Dans la liste, on compte évidemment The Office, Parks and Rec qui arrive sur Prime ou encore 30 Rock. mais il y en a plein d'autres, Tom, Maxime, Stéphane et Aki tentent de donner une définition claire du genre workplace comedy et parlent des oubliées comme Better Off Ted, des classiques comme Cheers ou des cultes et là, on se bat - Notre compte [Twitter] pour nous suivre **Les causeurs sur Twitter** Tom smallthingsfr Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Maxime SergeLamaDelRey Laetitia loun_r Thomas _ThomasTH Elodie Surnosecrans Maka MaKaTheFrenchie ▶ Où retrouver le podcast ?🔽 Podcloud iTunes Google Pod Spotify Podmust Castbox Podcast Addict 7x17 - Etats généraux des Whedonistes ou Whedon, son univers, ses fautes, ses œuvres Mar 07 2021 59 mins Depuis le post de Charisma Carpenter, les choses se sont accélérées pour Joss Whedon et Buffy. Pour parler de Joss Whedon, de Buffy et tout ce qu'on doit en penser, on accueille la spécialiste de pop-culture en général et de Buffy en particulier, **Yaële Simkovitch.** Cas isolés, vrais problèmes, surinterprétations, on ne sait plus si Joss Whedon est toujours un génie ou si son œuvre reste féministe. Le passage de Charisma Carpenter à la Dragon Con Pour retrouver le travail de Yaël Son [Twitter] [Ses interventions sur Buffy et Joss Whedon] - Notre compte [Twitter] pour nous suivre **Les causeurs sur Twitter** Tom smallthingsfr Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Maxime SergeLamaDelRey Laetitia loun_r Thomas _ThomasTH Elodie Surnosecrans Maka MaKaTheFrenchie ▶ Où retrouver le podcast ?🔽 Podcloud iTunes Google Pod Spotify Podmust Castbox Podcast Addict 7x07 - Friends vs How I Met Your Mother, le débat final Nov 08 2020 71 mins Deux séries comiques immanquables, deux générations de sitcoms, deux bandes d'amis, deux humours différents et pourtant, on ne cesse de les comparer. Qui de Friends ou de How I Met Your Mother est la meilleure ? On en parle dans ce débat avec Stéphane, Marina, Thomas et la team du podcast séries Series Junkies sur [iTtunes] ou [Anchor] avec [Docteur Séries] [Binge Doctor] et [Scarlett] ! Le débat s'articule autour de thèmes comme les personnages, l'humour, l'écriture, la longévité et l'héritage. N'hésitez pas à partager l'émission et à nous dire si vous êtes **TeamFriends** ou **TeamHIMYM** ! - Notre compte [Twitter] pour nous suivre **Les causeurs sur Twitter** Tom tomwitwicky Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Marina TVshows_Freak Laetitia loun_r Thomas _ThomasTH Elodie Surnosecrans Maxime SergeLamaDelRey - **Retrouvez Serial Causeurs sur ** Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook [ Twitter [ Youtube [ et sur [ 7x04 - Ted Lasso, Friday Night Lights et les séries sur le sport Oct 18 2020 36 mins Le sport dans les séries télé ? C'est pas si rare que ça. Avec le succès critique et public de Ted Lasso, série d'Apple TV, on revient sur les séries les plus sportives Stéphane, Maxime, Aki et Tom parlent sport avec notamment Friday Night Lights, 15/A, Blue Mountain State, Sports Night, Pitch, Les Frères Scott et bien d'autres ! - **Les causeurs sur Twitter** Tom tomwitwicky Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Marina TVshows_Freak Laetitia loun_r Thomas _ThomasTH Alexis alexisanovas Maxime SergeLamaDelRey - **Retrouvez Serial Causeurs sur ** Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook [ Twitter [ Youtube [ et sur [ 7x01 - Souviens-toi l'été dernier I May Destroy You, Little Voice, Teenage Bounty Hunters et les autres Sep 06 2020 49 mins Nous revoilà pour la saison 7, au programme ? Des séries, des séries, des séries ! Stéphane, Aki, Tom et Maxime sont là pour vous accueillir en cette rentrée sérielle mais retour sur l'été avec des pépites, des naseries et le reste. 147 Retrograde, Staged, Love in the Time of Corona 910 Happy Endings et Parks and Rec 1130 Teenage Bounty Hunters Netflix 1445 Little Voice Apple TV+ 1855 Fin pour Agents of SHIELD 2405 I May Destroy You 3020 Baby-sitters Club Netflix 3325 I Hate Suzy 3810 Fin pour Dark Netflix 3905 Cursed Netflix 3910 Perry Mason 4020 Brave New World 4050 Doom Patrol saison 2 4150 Stargirl 4225 A Suitable Boy 4305 Search Party saison 3 4310 Lovecraft Country OCS - **Les causeurs sur Twitter** Tom tomwitwicky Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Marina TVshows_Freak Laetitia loun_r Thomas _ThomasTH Alexis alexisanovas Maxime SergeLamaDelRey - **Retrouvez Serial Causeurs sur ** Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook [ Twitter [ Youtube [ et sur [ 6x23 - Mini-Séries Dinotopia, Years and Years, La Caverne de la Rose d'Or, Band of Brothers, American Sixties et d'autres Jun 22 2020 44 mins Avec la recrudescence des séries événements, on oublie vite que les mini-séries ont toujours été là et qu'elles arrivaient à s'arrêter après leur nombre d'épisodes voulus dès le départ. Entre Nord et Sud, Racines, La Caverne de la Rose d'Or, Le 10è Royaume, Band of Brothers ou Dolmen, on parlera de 1140 The Act 1840 Disparitions 2120 Mildred Pierce 2700 The Lost Room 3040 Years and Years 3530 Unbelievable 3900 The Sixties / American Sixties ** Les causeurs sur Twitter Tom tomwitwicky Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Marina TVshows_Freak Laetitia loun_r Thomas _ThomasTH Alexis alexisanovas et sa chaîne YouTube Désaksé Maxime SergeLamaDelRey Retrouvez Serial Causeurs sur Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook Twitter Youtube et sur 6x16 - Zoey's Extraordinary Playlist et les séries musicales Glee, Galavant, Flight of the Conchords, Smash... Apr 13 2020 40 mins Zoey's Extraordinary Playlist est la série qu'il faut voir en ce moment. Bonne humeur, chansons, réflexions, émotions, elle a tout pour vous plaire en ce début d'années un peu spécial. Pour revenir sur la série et le genre même de la série musicale, Alexis, Maxime, Stéphane, Aki et Tom discutent du genre et des pépites. ** Les causeurs sur Twitter Tom tomwitwicky Stéphane SeriesEater Aki piperaki_ Marina TVshows_Freak Laetitia loun_r Thomas _ThomasTH Alexis alexisanovas et sa chaîne YouTube Désaksé Maxime SergeLamaDelRey Retrouvez Serial Causeurs sur Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook Twitter Youtube et sur 6x10 - La 100è ! - 10 choses qui ont changé dans les séries depuis 2010 Jan 19 2020 52 mins C'est notre centième émission ! A cette occasion, nous nous sommes réunis pour un live exceptionnel le samedi 18 janvier. Pendant 4 heures, nous avons débattu et joué sur les séries. Il y avait les anciens et les actuels causeurs. La centième émission porte sur les 10 changements qui sont intervenus dans les séries et notre sériephilie depuis 2010. **1-Les networks 2-Le câble 3-Les formula shows 4-L’écriture 5-La série événement 6-Netflix 7-Le binge watching 8-Fin des séries fédératrices 9-La disparition des séries cultes 10-Le spoiler** Retrouvez, Elodie co-créatrice de l'émission, Renaud, Allan, Arnaud, Aubéry, Romain, Stéphane, Maxime, Alexis, Thomas, Marina et Laetitia pour cette petite heure de débat ! Les 3 heures de jeu arriveront bientôt ! Merci pour votre fidélité, n'hésitez jamais à faire vos retours *On s'excuse pour le son bas de certains, tout était ok de notre côté mais la technique nous a fait une farce, comme à nos débuts ! Comme quoi...* **Les causeurs sur Twitter** Tom [tomwitwicky] Stéphane [SeriesEater] Aki [piperaki_] Marina [TVshows_Freak] Laetitia [loun_r] Thomas [_ThomasTH] Alexis [alexisanovas] et sa [chaîne YouTube Désaksé] Maxime [SergeLamaDelRey] **Retrouvez Serial Causeurs sur Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook Twitter Youtube et sur Paris, Londres, New-York, pourquoi les séries en font des décors incontournables? Itw de Marion Miclet Dec 17 2019 32 mins Pourquoi Londres ou New-York sont des personnages à part entière dans certaines séries? Pourquoi certains décors sont sur-utilisés ? Comment une ville peut vivre à travers une série? L'auteure de [Découvrir New-York] en séries et [Découvrir Londres en séries] chez Huginn & Muninn, **Marion Miclet** nous parle de son livre et, bien entendu, de séries. The Crown, Doctor Who, Sex and The City, Fleabag, Friends... comment New-York et Londres ont été montrées. Et Paris dans tout ça ? Pour tout savoir sur les livres, l'auteure, l'application, direction le [site officiel.] **Entretien enregistré lors du Comic Con Paris d'octobre 2019.** 6x08 Des Fisher aux Pearson, retour sur les séries familiales Atypical, This Is Us, Succession, Six Feet Under... Dec 01 2019 54 mins On connait tous des familles de séries, on a vécu avec eux. Avec le buzz de Succession, la bonne saison 4 de This Is Us et le retour d'Atypical, on revient sur le genre avec Tom, Alexis, Aki, Stéphane et Thomas. **Les causeurs sur Twitter** Tom [tomwitwicky] Stéphane [SeriesEater] Aki [piperaki_] Marina [TVshows_Freak] Laetitia [loun_r] Thomas [_ThomasTH] Alexis [alexisanovas] et sa [chaîne YouTube Désaksé] Maxime [SergeLamaDelRey] **Retrouvez Serial Causeurs sur ** Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook Twitter Youtube 5x28 Le pire et le meilleur des séries de la saison ! Jun 28 2019 78 mins LE PIRE ET LE MEILLEUR DES SERIES 2018/2019 Nous arrivons à la fin de notre saison, cette cinquième du podcast a été riche en discussions et en débats. On a fait plus d'émissions que l'année dernière étonnamment alors qu'on pensait être à la rue, on a réuni davantage de sériephiles, on a débattu dans la bonne humeur, on a gagné un public fidèle, on grandit et donc **merci à vous !** Pour cette émission de fin de saison, on fait le bilan tranquillement. Comme depuis pas mal d'années maintenant, Smallthings réunit 20 sériephiles pour noter les séries de la saison 2018 / 2019 et dresser des Top et Flop. **Game of Thrones** saison 8 ? **Fleabag** ? **You** ? **Sex Education** ? Qui succédera à **BoJack Horseman** ? Vous pouvez dès à présent découvrir les classements sur ce [lien] ou les découvrir tranquillement dans notre podcast. Stéphane [Twitter] Tom [Twitter] Aki [Twitter] Marina [Twitter] et Maxime[Twitter] se réunissent pour tirer la gueulante ou respecter les choix du jury. Alors, qui sera la série de la saison ? Quelle est la série qui aura perdu beaucoup de points cette année? La réponse est dans l'épisode à ne pas rater ! - Retrouvez nous sur Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook Twitter Youtube 5x26 Doom Patrol, The Hot Zone, Chernobyl, Vida saison 2 et le planning Amazon / Netflix de Juin Jun 02 2019 52 mins Beaucoup trop de séries ces temps-ci même si on est en fin de saison régulière. Stéphane [Twitter] Tom [Twitter] Aki [Twitter] font le bilan rapide des séries de ces dernières semaines. Et le bilan est très positif ! Alors à vos plannings et appréciez les pitchs version Aki. 120 Vida saison 2 920 Gentleman Jack 1400 Doom Patrol 1730 Chernobyl 1830 Years and Years 2215 The Hot Zone 2540 Blood and Treasure 3100 Amazon Prime Shameless, Lodge 49, NOS4A2, Too Old To Die Young, Castle, Preacher ![amazon juin] 3500 Netflix Black Mirror... ![juin netflix] **Retrouvez nous sur** Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook Twitter Youtube 5x25 Et Game Of Thrones dans tout ça? May 22 2019 60 mins Après 8 saisons, **Game Of Thrones** s'est terminée sur HBO et OCS. Nous avions consacré une seule émission à la série pour parler de son aura et de savoir et comprendre ce qu'il se passait autour d'elle. à écouter [ici] Et puisque c'est un événement pour beaucoup, nous avons décidé de revenir, enfin, sur la série avec un vrai débat enflammé. Autour de [Laetitia] [Stéphane] [Marina] [Iris] et [Maxime] tentent de s'accorder pour savoir si **la saison 8 est une bonne saison, si la fin est bonne et si, finalement, Game Of Thrones restera une série culte ou juste une grande série... ou juste une série fédératrice?** ![Game of thrones] Retrouvez nous sur Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook Twitter Youtube 5x21 Les séries d'avril sur Netflix avec Sabrina, Chambers, Huge in France Mar 31 2019 30 mins Comme le mois dernier, nous essayons de faire notre petit tour des arrivées sur Netflix. Au programme ce mois-ci, pas beaucoup de choses intéressantes. On essaye quand même de se donner bonne conscience et on parle de la série avec Gad Elmaleh, **Huge in France**, de la partie 2 de **Sabrina**, du spin-off de **Z Nation**, de l'arrivée de **Chambers** mais aussi de séries animées comme **She-Ra** ou **Ultraman** ! Et puis si on regardait Le Secret de Nick avec Melissa Joan Hart, la vraie Sabrina ? Aki [Twitter] Stéphane [Twitter] et Tom [Twitter] sont au poste pour vous livre leurs impressions. Retrouvez nous sur Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook Twitter Youtube Youtube 5x17 La presse séries, entre magazines dépassés et journalisme maladroit Feb 24 2019 79 mins Séries TV, Séries Mag, Génériques, Génération Séries, combien d'entre vous ont acheté un magazine séries dans sa prime jeunesse, adolescente ou même maintenant? A l'occasion de la sortie du numéro spécial séries de l'hebdomadaire Le 1, Aki [Twitter] Stéphane [Twitter] Marina [Twitter] Iris [Twitter] accompagnent Tom [Twitter] pour débriefer ce magazine papier. Aussi, on reviendra sur le journalisme séries, y'a t-il vraiment un journalisme séries, comment parler de séries, qui sommes-nous pour juger? D Ensuite, nous plongerons dans deux magazines récents qui proposent tous les deux les 100 Meilleures Séries de Tous les Temps, rien que ça. Et vous allez être surpris de ce qu'on a découvert. Pour continuer le débat, n'hésitez pas aller regarder et écouter notre débat sur Comment Parler Séries que nous avons eu lors de notre live Happy Hour Séries à partir de 3h45 de vidéo Retrouvez nous sur Podcloud Itunes Spotify Deezer Facebook Twitter Youtube Youtube 5x13 Carte Blanche Stéphane spéciale SKAM avec la scénariste Clémence Lebatteux de SKAM France Jan 20 2019 86 mins Actu oblige, nous proposons notre seconde carte blanche. Stéphane a décidé de parler de SKAM, la série teen norvégienne et de son adaptation française en compagnie d'une des scénaristes de la série, Clémence Lebatteux [Twitter] Tom et Arnaud sont aussi là. ![Skam France] **Première Partie SKAM FRANCE, Clémence et nous** Petite présentation de Clémence Lebatteux par elle-même avec un TOP 5 de ses séries favorites, histoire de tâter le terrain de sa sériephilie. Son arrivée sur SKAM France et ce qu'elle peut nous dire sur la saison 3 et 4. - Top 5 + la série qu'elle aurait aimé inventer + la série qu'elle aurait aimé écrire pour la rendre meilleure - Parcours + arrivée sur SKAM, sa découverte de la série et sur celles des Causeurs, Tom et Arnaud. - Quelques infos sur la saison 3 et saison 4 - Quel est son rôle sur la série ? Sa journée type de scénariste ? son travail ? - Pas trop peur de l'attente autour de cette saison 3 cruciale ? **2400 Deuxième Partie SKAM, les adaptations et la conquête du monde** SKAM France est le premier remake de la série hors de sa Norvège natale et elle est en train de conquérir le monde de la série ado. Le phénomène scandinave secoue le monde et les adaptations se multiplient à la vitesse de la lumière. On aborde donc le sujet avec le fan Arnaud, qui a tout vu, et on revient sur le travail d'adaptation qui est bien difficile en France. - Arnaud et son tour du monde SKAM-ien Quel pays a son SKAM ? Quel est le meilleur remake ? Quelles sont les différences entre les différents shows ? - Questions pour Clémence comment on adapte quelque chose d'aussi culturellement lointain ? Quelles sont les principales difficultés d'adaptation ? Y a-t-il un cahier des charges strict à respecter ? A quel point la chaîne et les producteurs sont impliqués ? Peut-on s'éloigner du matériau originel sans craindre les fans de la première heure ? **4300 Troisième Partie Au-delà de SKAM, c'est quoi être scénariste en France ?** La présence de Clémence est utile pour essayer de saisir l'essence de son métier qui prend désormais un peu plus d'ampleur. - Est-ce compliqué de se former ? Est-ce que c'est pour ça que tu es partie en Angleterre ? - Les collectifs de scénaristes sont-ils vitaux pour eux ? - Le scénariste français est-il en train de devenir showrunner au fur et à mesure du temps ? - Comment vend-on un projet de séries ? Combien de temps cela prend-il pour parvenir sur un écran ? - Elle ressemble à quoi la "Writer's room" à la française ? - Quel est ton futur projet ? - Est-ce que la réalisation de ton court-métrage est l'étape la plus logique pour la suite de ta carrière ? Est-ce qu'être scénariste et réalisatrice sur ton propre show est important/vital ? 5x08 Les Séries que vous ne regardez pas Wrecked, Z Nation, Madame Secretary, Vis a Vis, Mrs Maisel, MacGyver Dec 02 2018 42 mins Pour cette nouvelle session de séries que vous ne regardez pas, Romain, Iris, Thomas, Laetitia, Stéphane et Tom ont choisi 6 séries dont les médias et les sériephiles parlent peu. 120 Madame Secretary 615 MacGyver 1400 Derrière les Barreaux Vis a Vis 2120 Z Nation 2755 Mrs Maisel saison 2 dès le 5 décembre 3530 Wrecked Retrouvez nous sur Twitter 4x15 - Les upfronts avec les séries annulées de 2018 Quantico, Lucifer, Scorpion, Brooklyn Nine-Nine May 18 2018 58 mins Sommaire 210 Brooklyn Nine-Nine 245 ABC avec Alex Inc., Kevin Probably Saves the world, Quantico... 1450 CBS avec Scorpion, Me, Myself and I 1930 FOX avec Lucifer, Brooklyn Nine-Nine, The Exorcist, The Last Man of Earth... 3000 les séries qui ne devraient durer qu'une saison avec Once Upon a Time... 3630 CW avec Life Sentence 3730 X-Files 4130 Gotham 4300 L'Arme Fatale 4400 Timeless 4830 les séries de la rentrée avec Manifest, The Passage... Hakim1976 Aug 10 2020 Un des meilleurs podcasts sur l'actualité des séries avec une bonne équipe calée sur le sujet . Dans mon top 3 de podcasts sur les séries ! Découvrez tout ce que vous devez savoir sur Doctor Who Saison 13 ! La date de sortie, l’histoire saison 13 de Doctor Who est une certitude. Mais quand la série sera-t-elle diffusée, et que se passera-t-il dans la troisième saison de Jodie Whittaker en tant que Doctor ? La finale de la saison 12 de Doctor Who, The Timeless Children », a réécrit toute l’histoire de la série télévisée de la BBC. Jodie Whittaker n’est plus la treizième Docteur. Elle n’a plus aucune idée du nombre de ses incarnations est clair que le présentateur Chris Chibnall a une vision globale. Son thème Timeless Child » a été mis en place dans Doctor Who saison 11, épisode 2. Les exécutions sont cependant mitigées et les chiffres d’audience sont en baisse. Malgré cela, Doctor Who reste la série de science-fiction phare. Il est clair que Doctor Who n’est pas en danger d’ faut espérer que la saison 13 de Doctor Who abordera certains des problèmes de la saison 12. Avec un certain nombre de scénarios étonnamment précipités et une mauvaise signalisation des rebondissements du troisième acte. Chibnall vient de transformer la mythologie de Doctor Who. Ce qui signifie avec une bonne écriture que cette saison pourrait être particulièrement production de la saison 13 de Doctor Who devrait commencer à l’automne 2020, peut-être en septembre. L’ère Chibnall est réputée pour sa grande qualité de production. Les années des monstres en papier bulle ont disparu, remplacées par des images de synthèse de haute qualité. Eet la production devrait donc durer environ 10 mois. Cela signifie que la date de sortie de la saison 13 de Doctor Who devrait être pour l’automne 2021, peut-être dans le même créneau que la saison 11 d’ Of The Daleks arrivera entre la Saison 12 et 13 de Doctor WhoLa saison 13 de Doctor Who sera précédée d’une émission spéciale unique, Revolution of the Daleks ». Elle reprendra sans doute le dramatique cliffhanger de la fin de la saison 12 de Doctor Who. La BBC appelle cette émission Holiday Special ». Refusant de confirmer si elle sera diffusée le jour de Noël ou le jour de l’An. Chibnall lui-même a laissé entendre que la programmation n’est pas encore va être l’histoire de la prochaine saison ?La saison 12 de Doctor Who s’achève de façon dramatique, avec le Docteur emprisonné par les Judoon pour des crimes dont elle ne se souvient même pas. Sa famille a été ramenée à son époque via un TARDIS qui lui est propre. Et ils croient que le Docteur est mort. Le gros de l’affaire sera sans doute traité dans le Spécial des Fêtes. Mais certaines répercussions pourraient se répercuter sur la saison 13 de Doctor révélations de The Timeless Children » auront certainement un effet durable sur les mythes de la série. Ajoutant beaucoup plus de mystère au Docteur. Elle sait maintenant que toute son histoire est un mensonge et qu’elle n’est pas du tout un Seigneur du Temps. Il est possible que cela conduise le Docteur à essayer de redécouvrir son propre peuple, qui n’a jamais été vu auparavant. En attendant, il est possible que d’autres rencontres avec des incarnations passées oubliées aient lieu. Y compris, espérons-le, celle du Docteur Ruth de Jo différence de casting ?La saison 13 de Doctor Who verra le retour de Jodie Whittaker en tant que Docteur. Il n’y a pas lieu de se demander si ses compagnons – Graham de Bradley Walsh, Yaz de Mandip Gill et Ryan de Tosin Cole reviendront également. Ils ont été renvoyés dans leur temps libre, ce qui signifie qu’ils pourraient décider d’y rester. Ryan et Yaz en particulier ont eu des conversations dans lesquelles ils ont envisagé la vie après le Docteur. Ce qui pourrait préfigurer leur départ dans le Spécial l’explication de la fin de la saison 12 de Doctor Who timeless child, seigneur du temps, la division etc. As for BBC Three it is a million miles better than most of the shite on cable. There are dozens of channels which I never watch - absolute rubbish full of endless ads. 0 TV is going through a period of huge change. What does any enterprise need to weather and indeed thrive in a period of such change? They need a stable foundation, a secure financial footing, which allows them to innovate and evolve in response. Now is the worst time to start tinkering with those foundations. They don't have "a stable foundation, a secure financial footing, which allows them to innovate and evolve in response." They have a pittance to spend when compared to their new competitors. I've mentioned it before but Amazon are spending roughly as much on the first season of their Lord of the Rings series as the BBC spends on drama in an entire year. British broadcasters have never faced such well funded competition before, and unlike in the past those mostly US competitors can access the UK market directly. Netflix and other streamers have massively bigger budgets, but way more watch the BBC. Looks to me like the BBC is a model of efficiency we should be celebrating then! Except a nobody actually fully knows for certain Netflix viewership as they never release it and b there is an absolutely huge demographic split. Oldies continue to watch linear tv, but middle aged and younger people don't at anywhere near the same amount. Media is having the same revolution as the globalisation of every other industry over the past 20-30 years, and many seem to want to try and repeat the mistake of those industries holding onto this yes but we are the best mantra, no need to change. There is a common fallacy in political thinking. It goes like this... Something needs to change. This is something. So we should do BBC and Channel 4 are well aware that the broader industry is changing and changing rapidly. The BBC and Channel 4 are Dorries thinks that privatising Channel 4 is the change that is needed. Dorries didn't even know how Channel 4 was funded some months ago. Why should I believe that Dorries now knows better what change is needed than the people in Channel 4 and the wider industry, who largely don't think this is the change that is needed?I don't think Government automatically knows best. I think there are plenty of contexts where Government should step back and let enterprises get on with the job. My original comment was exactly this.....I linked to an article was saying yes aware of the elephant in the room, but there is never any suggestion of how to adapt. Its instant we can't change this way because yadda yadda yadda. Ok, and so how do you suggest changing, and there is tumbleweed. How are BBC or CH4 adapting? BBC Three coming back, genius. 4k / HDR still in "beta" for years and the system failed on iPlayer for Euro final. Sky / BT / Netflix have had 4k for years now. Channel 4 isn't going to turn it into Netflix. How is Nadine Dorries's change going to solve the disappearance of linear TV? Channel 4 one.....Waffle waffle buzz word waffle....no mention 4k, no mention HDR, "Using a more viewer-centric approach to inform activity and decisions across Channel 4".."Rolling out personalisation features on All 4, including smarter recommendations"Fk me, they are like 10 years behind the rest of the normal world is that if their "future goals" for 2025. Just more evidence their tech is just garbage. How is Nadine Dorries's change going to solve the disappearance of linear TV? AGAIN.....nobody is answering my question.....any suggestion of change is met we no we can't do that / that would be bad....so what are the proposals. You linked to their plans, and its a joke. Buzz word salad and the some vague realisation that Machine learning exists and that perhaps in 3 years time they might have a basic recommendation service, which Netflix, Spotify etc etc etc have had from their inception and which the likes of TikTok absolutely smash. This is not so forgive us all if there's more focus on the political aspects. The change that has been proposed by Dorries is to sell Channel 4, to take it out of public ownership, to dismantle Thatcher's Dorries's change solve the challenges you tell us about? those very significant challenges still exist is an important point, but they are somewhat tangential. That is just trying to side step the issue. There is zero evidence the BBC or CH4 have an real idea how to adapt to this changed world. I posted a link earlier showing how way more people watch the BBC than Netflix. Channel 4 was tied with Netflix, IIRC, despite spending far less. So, the world has changed and the BBC and Channel 4 are doing more than say "changed world" above. You are probably going to reply talking about trajectory and future changes to come. You probably should've said "changING world".If you want to talk about the future, explain how a privatised Channel 4 or BBC would adapt better. ITV is privatised and is doing a terrible job of adapting! And we circle right back around to my initial point. Those who want to fight against this privatisation need to propose a coherent plan for the future, and the key problem is they never do. It is classic Sir Humphrey, we can't do that reply, look at what we did 30 years ago. So either the government will get its way or they will U-Turn, the CH4 supporters will celebrate initially and I bet they don't adapt. Donald Trump once suggested injecting bleach to cure COVID-19. Sometimes ideas suggest by politicians are stupid and it's fine to say they're wrong, without Today, yes, but their entire business model is being destroyed. Anyone who knows anything understands that what is true today might not be the same in the they embrace the future, or they die. That their erstwhile "defenders" of the status quo want to defend it as being able to make money via commercials today isn't a really good endorsement for it adapting for the future. The problem is neither the Beeb or C4 see this or accept this. They just want to cling on to the past model irrespective of how the market is changing. But this is industry is notorious for it. Be it home taping, VHS video, Napster. Any technological change or innovation is resisted. Even the migration from black and white to colour TV was a problem. This is just nonsense. The BBC and C4 are very aware of how the industry is changing. Neither is proposing doing nothing. Both have embraced technological change and innovation. What they are opposing is a specific change in how they are funded. Given no-one in this thread can explain why these changes in funding model would solve any of the global challenges in broadcasting, I sympathise with their a political ideology called conservatism that recognises the value of established institutions and suggests we should be wary of tinkering with the fundamentals. It often champions this country's success stories. It used to have a lot of MPs in Parliament. I wonder where they all went? You literally linked to these plans and CH4 "technological innovation" is basically have a recommendation system that has been standard in every other walk of life for 5 years. Totally clueless. iPlayer tech is crap, 4oD tech is crap, what's the plan to hire people to compete. Where's my 4K, where's my proper HDR. Disney literally paid several billion dollars to buy BAMTech, so they had the tech required for their Disney+ streaming service, in order to ensure they had the tech to compete. The weird thing is that the web iPlayer actually has proper 1080p and it gets pushed as far as the CDNs! - they just don't expose access to it it via the web interface. iPlayer via Virgin cable has UHD for a fair few shows now. By "fair few" you mean hardly any... I’ve seen quite a few in UHD through Virgin cable. They tend to do them in UHD when the show suits it I think. That is exactly my link. That is tiny list in 2022. It isn't about when it suits, it is as much who made it The Tourist was made with HBO. HBO will insist on 4k. 9/11 Inside the President's War Room was made in conjunction with Apple+. 0 The destruction of Russian war equipment continues..."Ukraine 2 days ago, the Operational Command "East" of the Ukrainian Army posted video that claimed to show "over 40" Russian vehicles destroyed by Ukrainian Artillery fire on a Russian rear base. We did not publish it, as we couldn't verify the claim or the target. However...It actually turns out that this claim was legitimate, with at least 35 vehicles totally destroyed or damaged; mostly supply or fuel trucks, but with BMP/T-72 variant also. This is a serious blow." Both Ukrainian intel and targeting very sharp there. They don't tend to get into the detail understandably, but one area one assumes the West is able to have an oversized impact would be worth intel. They also don't have to spend all their time protecting Kyiv now, so can get to grips with how to really hurt the Russians in the south and east. 0 TV is going through a period of huge change. What does any enterprise need to weather and indeed thrive in a period of such change? They need a stable foundation, a secure financial footing, which allows them to innovate and evolve in response. Now is the worst time to start tinkering with those foundations. They don't have "a stable foundation, a secure financial footing, which allows them to innovate and evolve in response." They have a pittance to spend when compared to their new competitors. I've mentioned it before but Amazon are spending roughly as much on the first season of their Lord of the Rings series as the BBC spends on drama in an entire year. British broadcasters have never faced such well funded competition before, and unlike in the past those mostly US competitors can access the UK market directly. Netflix and other streamers have massively bigger budgets, but way more watch the BBC. Looks to me like the BBC is a model of efficiency we should be celebrating then! Except a nobody actually fully knows for certain Netflix viewership as they never release it and b there is an absolutely huge demographic split. Oldies continue to watch linear tv, but middle aged and younger people don't at anywhere near the same amount. Media is having the same revolution as the globalisation of every other industry over the past 20-30 years, and many seem to want to try and repeat the mistake of those industries holding onto this yes but we are the best mantra, no need to change. There is a common fallacy in political thinking. It goes like this... Something needs to change. This is something. So we should do BBC and Channel 4 are well aware that the broader industry is changing and changing rapidly. The BBC and Channel 4 are Dorries thinks that privatising Channel 4 is the change that is needed. Dorries didn't even know how Channel 4 was funded some months ago. Why should I believe that Dorries now knows better what change is needed than the people in Channel 4 and the wider industry, who largely don't think this is the change that is needed?I don't think Government automatically knows best. I think there are plenty of contexts where Government should step back and let enterprises get on with the job. My original comment was exactly this.....I linked to an article was saying yes aware of the elephant in the room, but there is never any suggestion of how to adapt. Its instant we can't change this way because yadda yadda yadda. Ok, and so how do you suggest changing, and there is tumbleweed. How are BBC or CH4 adapting? BBC Three coming back, genius. 4k / HDR still in "beta" for years and the system failed on iPlayer for Euro final. Sky / BT / Netflix have had 4k for years now. Channel 4 isn't going to turn it into Netflix. How is Nadine Dorries's change going to solve the disappearance of linear TV? Channel 4 one.....Waffle waffle buzz word waffle....no mention 4k, no mention HDR, "Using a more viewer-centric approach to inform activity and decisions across Channel 4".."Rolling out personalisation features on All 4, including smarter recommendations"Fk me, they are like 10 years behind the rest of the normal world is that if their "future goals" for 2025. Just more evidence their tech is just garbage. How is Nadine Dorries's change going to solve the disappearance of linear TV? AGAIN.....nobody is answering my question.....any suggestion of change is met we no we can't do that / that would be bad....so what are the proposals. You linked to their plans, and its a joke. Buzz word salad and the some vague realisation that Machine learning exists and that perhaps in 3 years time they might have a basic recommendation service, which Netflix, Spotify etc etc etc have had from their inception and which the likes of TikTok absolutely smash. This is not so forgive us all if there's more focus on the political aspects. The change that has been proposed by Dorries is to sell Channel 4, to take it out of public ownership, to dismantle Thatcher's Dorries's change solve the challenges you tell us about? those very significant challenges still exist is an important point, but they are somewhat tangential. That is just trying to side step the issue. There is zero evidence the BBC or CH4 have an real idea how to adapt to this changed world. I posted a link earlier showing how way more people watch the BBC than Netflix. Channel 4 was tied with Netflix, IIRC, despite spending far less. So, the world has changed and the BBC and Channel 4 are doing more than say "changed world" above. You are probably going to reply talking about trajectory and future changes to come. You probably should've said "changING world".If you want to talk about the future, explain how a privatised Channel 4 or BBC would adapt better. ITV is privatised and is doing a terrible job of adapting! And we circle right back around to my initial point. Those who want to fight against this privatisation need to propose a coherent plan for the future, and the key problem is they never do. It is classic Sir Humphrey, we can't do that reply, look at what we did 30 years ago. So either the government will get its way or they will U-Turn, the CH4 supporters will celebrate initially and I bet they don't adapt. Donald Trump once suggested injecting bleach to cure COVID-19. Sometimes ideas suggest by politicians are stupid and it's fine to say they're wrong, without Today, yes, but their entire business model is being destroyed. Anyone who knows anything understands that what is true today might not be the same in the they embrace the future, or they die. That their erstwhile "defenders" of the status quo want to defend it as being able to make money via commercials today isn't a really good endorsement for it adapting for the future. The problem is neither the Beeb or C4 see this or accept this. They just want to cling on to the past model irrespective of how the market is changing. But this is industry is notorious for it. Be it home taping, VHS video, Napster. Any technological change or innovation is resisted. Even the migration from black and white to colour TV was a problem. This is just nonsense. The BBC and C4 are very aware of how the industry is changing. Neither is proposing doing nothing. Both have embraced technological change and innovation. What they are opposing is a specific change in how they are funded. Given no-one in this thread can explain why these changes in funding model would solve any of the global challenges in broadcasting, I sympathise with their a political ideology called conservatism that recognises the value of established institutions and suggests we should be wary of tinkering with the fundamentals. It often champions this country's success stories. It used to have a lot of MPs in Parliament. I wonder where they all went? You literally linked to these plans and CH4 "technological innovation" is basically have a recommendation system that has been standard in every other walk of life for 5 years. Totally clueless. iPlayer tech is crap, 4oD tech is crap, what's the plan to hire people to compete. Where's my 4K, where's my proper HDR. Disney literally paid several billion dollars to buy BAMTech, so they had the tech required for their Disney+ streaming service, in order to ensure they had the tech to compete. Sorry but for most people and indeed most content 4k and proper HDR aren't worth the very significant additional because most people really wouldn't care and except for sport and for Premium Drama 4K and proper HDR just isn't required. Er, what “significant extra costs” UHD TVs are standard nowadays. 1080p tv's are very much in the minority now and normally the small sized ones. I won't be surprised if all the major brands just stop selling any shortly. I don't believe the big brands like Samsung, LG, Sony, even make them, they are just a cheap Chinese one from somebody like TCL they stick a brand label on. Indeed. eek was completely wrong about that. 0 Anyway! It's Local Elections Nominations Day! Hoop Hoop!In Havering, we have Havering Residents Association vs Hornchurch & Upminster Independents in one ward, and Havering Residents Association vs Indepdendent Harold Hill Resisdents association in another, and Harold Wood Residents vs Havering Residents Harold Wood in a politics are just bonkers. 4 Anyway! It's Local Elections Nominations Day! Hoop Hoop!In Havering, we have Havering Residents Association vs Hornchurch & Upminster Independents in one ward, and Havering Residents Association vs Indepdendent Harold Hill Resisdents association in another, and Harold Wood Residents vs Havering Residents Harold Wood in a politics are just bonkers. Splitters! 1 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? 1 As for BBC Three it is a million miles better than most of the shite on cable. There are dozens of channels which I never watch - absolute rubbish full of endless ads. The crap cable / satellite channels are dead men walking too. Sky should be as worried as anybody about how the world of media is problem is BBC Three isn't better in the minds of the target demographic than the array of other options...that's why the yuff aren't watching BBC Three. The people saying well I think BBC Three is alright, you aren't the demographic, its teenagers through to mid 20s, and they ain't watching when it was on iPlayer and they ain't watching now its back on linear tv. 1 Anyway! It's Local Elections Nominations Day! Hoop Hoop!In Havering, we have Havering Residents Association vs Hornchurch & Upminster Independents in one ward, and Havering Residents Association vs Indepdendent Harold Hill Resisdents association in another, and Harold Wood Residents vs Havering Residents Harold Wood in a politics are just bonkers. I think we're done and dusted in Aberdeenshire with nominations. The council has published the candidate list and it's not as exciting as all that Havering stuff. 0 TV is going through a period of huge change. What does any enterprise need to weather and indeed thrive in a period of such change? They need a stable foundation, a secure financial footing, which allows them to innovate and evolve in response. Now is the worst time to start tinkering with those foundations. They don't have "a stable foundation, a secure financial footing, which allows them to innovate and evolve in response." They have a pittance to spend when compared to their new competitors. I've mentioned it before but Amazon are spending roughly as much on the first season of their Lord of the Rings series as the BBC spends on drama in an entire year. British broadcasters have never faced such well funded competition before, and unlike in the past those mostly US competitors can access the UK market directly. Netflix and other streamers have massively bigger budgets, but way more watch the BBC. Looks to me like the BBC is a model of efficiency we should be celebrating then! Except a nobody actually fully knows for certain Netflix viewership as they never release it and b there is an absolutely huge demographic split. Oldies continue to watch linear tv, but middle aged and younger people don't at anywhere near the same amount. Media is having the same revolution as the globalisation of every other industry over the past 20-30 years, and many seem to want to try and repeat the mistake of those industries holding onto this yes but we are the best mantra, no need to change. There is a common fallacy in political thinking. It goes like this... Something needs to change. This is something. So we should do BBC and Channel 4 are well aware that the broader industry is changing and changing rapidly. The BBC and Channel 4 are Dorries thinks that privatising Channel 4 is the change that is needed. Dorries didn't even know how Channel 4 was funded some months ago. Why should I believe that Dorries now knows better what change is needed than the people in Channel 4 and the wider industry, who largely don't think this is the change that is needed?I don't think Government automatically knows best. I think there are plenty of contexts where Government should step back and let enterprises get on with the job. My original comment was exactly this.....I linked to an article was saying yes aware of the elephant in the room, but there is never any suggestion of how to adapt. Its instant we can't change this way because yadda yadda yadda. Ok, and so how do you suggest changing, and there is tumbleweed. How are BBC or CH4 adapting? BBC Three coming back, genius. 4k / HDR still in "beta" for years and the system failed on iPlayer for Euro final. Sky / BT / Netflix have had 4k for years now. Channel 4 isn't going to turn it into Netflix. How is Nadine Dorries's change going to solve the disappearance of linear TV? Channel 4 one.....Waffle waffle buzz word waffle....no mention 4k, no mention HDR, "Using a more viewer-centric approach to inform activity and decisions across Channel 4".."Rolling out personalisation features on All 4, including smarter recommendations"Fk me, they are like 10 years behind the rest of the normal world is that if their "future goals" for 2025. Just more evidence their tech is just garbage. How is Nadine Dorries's change going to solve the disappearance of linear TV? AGAIN.....nobody is answering my question.....any suggestion of change is met we no we can't do that / that would be bad....so what are the proposals. You linked to their plans, and its a joke. Buzz word salad and the some vague realisation that Machine learning exists and that perhaps in 3 years time they might have a basic recommendation service, which Netflix, Spotify etc etc etc have had from their inception and which the likes of TikTok absolutely smash. This is not so forgive us all if there's more focus on the political aspects. The change that has been proposed by Dorries is to sell Channel 4, to take it out of public ownership, to dismantle Thatcher's Dorries's change solve the challenges you tell us about? those very significant challenges still exist is an important point, but they are somewhat tangential. That is just trying to side step the issue. There is zero evidence the BBC or CH4 have an real idea how to adapt to this changed world. I posted a link earlier showing how way more people watch the BBC than Netflix. Channel 4 was tied with Netflix, IIRC, despite spending far less. So, the world has changed and the BBC and Channel 4 are doing more than say "changed world" above. You are probably going to reply talking about trajectory and future changes to come. You probably should've said "changING world".If you want to talk about the future, explain how a privatised Channel 4 or BBC would adapt better. ITV is privatised and is doing a terrible job of adapting! And we circle right back around to my initial point. Those who want to fight against this privatisation need to propose a coherent plan for the future, and the key problem is they never do. It is classic Sir Humphrey, we can't do that reply, look at what we did 30 years ago. So either the government will get its way or they will U-Turn, the CH4 supporters will celebrate initially and I bet they don't adapt. Donald Trump once suggested injecting bleach to cure COVID-19. Sometimes ideas suggest by politicians are stupid and it's fine to say they're wrong, without Today, yes, but their entire business model is being destroyed. Anyone who knows anything understands that what is true today might not be the same in the they embrace the future, or they die. That their erstwhile "defenders" of the status quo want to defend it as being able to make money via commercials today isn't a really good endorsement for it adapting for the future. The problem is neither the Beeb or C4 see this or accept this. They just want to cling on to the past model irrespective of how the market is changing. But this is industry is notorious for it. Be it home taping, VHS video, Napster. Any technological change or innovation is resisted. Even the migration from black and white to colour TV was a problem. This is just nonsense. The BBC and C4 are very aware of how the industry is changing. Neither is proposing doing nothing. Both have embraced technological change and innovation. What they are opposing is a specific change in how they are funded. Given no-one in this thread can explain why these changes in funding model would solve any of the global challenges in broadcasting, I sympathise with their a political ideology called conservatism that recognises the value of established institutions and suggests we should be wary of tinkering with the fundamentals. It often champions this country's success stories. It used to have a lot of MPs in Parliament. I wonder where they all went? You literally linked to these plans and CH4 "technological innovation" is basically have a recommendation system that has been standard in every other walk of life for 5 years. Totally clueless. iPlayer tech is crap, 4oD tech is crap, what's the plan to hire people to compete. Where's my 4K, where's my proper HDR. Disney literally paid several billion dollars to buy BAMTech, so they had the tech required for their Disney+ streaming service, in order to ensure they had the tech to compete. The weird thing is that the web iPlayer actually has proper 1080p and it gets pushed as far as the CDNs! - they just don't expose access to it it via the web interface. iPlayer via Virgin cable has UHD for a fair few shows now. By "fair few" you mean hardly any... I’ve seen quite a few in UHD through Virgin cable. They tend to do them in UHD when the show suits it I think. That is exactly my link. That is tiny list in 2022. It isn't about when it suits, it is as much who made it The Tourist was made with HBO. HBO will insist on 4k. 9/11 Inside the President's War Room was made in conjunction with Apple+. It’s not tiny unless you watch far too much telly! It would take me years to get through all those! I’ve seen some of them but not that many. 0 It's striking how much support Boris Johnson is getting for his comments on trans issues from people who are not his natural supporters. This one is typicalannettepaceyOh god oh no someone I loathe just made a really good point. Still could never bring myself to vote for the bastard but this is what happens when Labour turn their backs on women and leave an open goal labourlosingwomen No, I've been told by PB experts that saying women have cocks won't hurt Labour. I think ultimately their hatred of Boris / Brexit will still have these people don their Polly Trademarked nose pegs and vote against Boris. Yes but people who say things like that aren't the target - it's the floaters who will play safe. 0 The destruction of Russian war equipment continues..."Ukraine 2 days ago, the Operational Command "East" of the Ukrainian Army posted video that claimed to show "over 40" Russian vehicles destroyed by Ukrainian Artillery fire on a Russian rear base. We did not publish it, as we couldn't verify the claim or the target. However...It actually turns out that this claim was legitimate, with at least 35 vehicles totally destroyed or damaged; mostly supply or fuel trucks, but with BMP/T-72 variant also. This is a serious blow." Both Ukrainian intel and targeting very sharp there. They don't tend to get into the detail understandably, but one area one assumes the West is able to have an oversized impact would be worth What's significant about an operation like this one is that it implies a fairly tight integration of intelligence gathered, target identified, communicated to units in the field that can act, target hit under individual step requires a certain level of competence, but combining them all together is that much more difficult, and therefore impressive. 0 TV is going through a period of huge change. What does any enterprise need to weather and indeed thrive in a period of such change? They need a stable foundation, a secure financial footing, which allows them to innovate and evolve in response. Now is the worst time to start tinkering with those foundations. They don't have "a stable foundation, a secure financial footing, which allows them to innovate and evolve in response." They have a pittance to spend when compared to their new competitors. I've mentioned it before but Amazon are spending roughly as much on the first season of their Lord of the Rings series as the BBC spends on drama in an entire year. British broadcasters have never faced such well funded competition before, and unlike in the past those mostly US competitors can access the UK market directly. Netflix and other streamers have massively bigger budgets, but way more watch the BBC. Looks to me like the BBC is a model of efficiency we should be celebrating then! Except a nobody actually fully knows for certain Netflix viewership as they never release it and b there is an absolutely huge demographic split. Oldies continue to watch linear tv, but middle aged and younger people don't at anywhere near the same amount. Media is having the same revolution as the globalisation of every other industry over the past 20-30 years, and many seem to want to try and repeat the mistake of those industries holding onto this yes but we are the best mantra, no need to change. There is a common fallacy in political thinking. It goes like this... Something needs to change. This is something. So we should do BBC and Channel 4 are well aware that the broader industry is changing and changing rapidly. The BBC and Channel 4 are Dorries thinks that privatising Channel 4 is the change that is needed. Dorries didn't even know how Channel 4 was funded some months ago. Why should I believe that Dorries now knows better what change is needed than the people in Channel 4 and the wider industry, who largely don't think this is the change that is needed?I don't think Government automatically knows best. I think there are plenty of contexts where Government should step back and let enterprises get on with the job. My original comment was exactly this.....I linked to an article was saying yes aware of the elephant in the room, but there is never any suggestion of how to adapt. Its instant we can't change this way because yadda yadda yadda. Ok, and so how do you suggest changing, and there is tumbleweed. How are BBC or CH4 adapting? BBC Three coming back, genius. 4k / HDR still in "beta" for years and the system failed on iPlayer for Euro final. Sky / BT / Netflix have had 4k for years now. Channel 4 isn't going to turn it into Netflix. How is Nadine Dorries's change going to solve the disappearance of linear TV? Channel 4 one.....Waffle waffle buzz word waffle....no mention 4k, no mention HDR, "Using a more viewer-centric approach to inform activity and decisions across Channel 4".."Rolling out personalisation features on All 4, including smarter recommendations"Fk me, they are like 10 years behind the rest of the normal world is that if their "future goals" for 2025. Just more evidence their tech is just garbage. How is Nadine Dorries's change going to solve the disappearance of linear TV? AGAIN.....nobody is answering my question.....any suggestion of change is met we no we can't do that / that would be bad....so what are the proposals. You linked to their plans, and its a joke. Buzz word salad and the some vague realisation that Machine learning exists and that perhaps in 3 years time they might have a basic recommendation service, which Netflix, Spotify etc etc etc have had from their inception and which the likes of TikTok absolutely smash. This is not so forgive us all if there's more focus on the political aspects. The change that has been proposed by Dorries is to sell Channel 4, to take it out of public ownership, to dismantle Thatcher's Dorries's change solve the challenges you tell us about? those very significant challenges still exist is an important point, but they are somewhat tangential. That is just trying to side step the issue. There is zero evidence the BBC or CH4 have an real idea how to adapt to this changed world. I posted a link earlier showing how way more people watch the BBC than Netflix. Channel 4 was tied with Netflix, IIRC, despite spending far less. So, the world has changed and the BBC and Channel 4 are doing more than say "changed world" above. You are probably going to reply talking about trajectory and future changes to come. You probably should've said "changING world".If you want to talk about the future, explain how a privatised Channel 4 or BBC would adapt better. ITV is privatised and is doing a terrible job of adapting! And we circle right back around to my initial point. Those who want to fight against this privatisation need to propose a coherent plan for the future, and the key problem is they never do. It is classic Sir Humphrey, we can't do that reply, look at what we did 30 years ago. So either the government will get its way or they will U-Turn, the CH4 supporters will celebrate initially and I bet they don't adapt. Donald Trump once suggested injecting bleach to cure COVID-19. Sometimes ideas suggest by politicians are stupid and it's fine to say they're wrong, without Today, yes, but their entire business model is being destroyed. Anyone who knows anything understands that what is true today might not be the same in the they embrace the future, or they die. That their erstwhile "defenders" of the status quo want to defend it as being able to make money via commercials today isn't a really good endorsement for it adapting for the future. The problem is neither the Beeb or C4 see this or accept this. They just want to cling on to the past model irrespective of how the market is changing. But this is industry is notorious for it. Be it home taping, VHS video, Napster. Any technological change or innovation is resisted. Even the migration from black and white to colour TV was a problem. This is just nonsense. The BBC and C4 are very aware of how the industry is changing. Neither is proposing doing nothing. Both have embraced technological change and innovation. What they are opposing is a specific change in how they are funded. Given no-one in this thread can explain why these changes in funding model would solve any of the global challenges in broadcasting, I sympathise with their a political ideology called conservatism that recognises the value of established institutions and suggests we should be wary of tinkering with the fundamentals. It often champions this country's success stories. It used to have a lot of MPs in Parliament. I wonder where they all went? You literally linked to these plans and CH4 "technological innovation" is basically have a recommendation system that has been standard in every other walk of life for 5 years. Totally clueless. iPlayer tech is crap, 4oD tech is crap, what's the plan to hire people to compete. Where's my 4K, where's my proper HDR. Disney literally paid several billion dollars to buy BAMTech, so they had the tech required for their Disney+ streaming service, in order to ensure they had the tech to compete. The weird thing is that the web iPlayer actually has proper 1080p and it gets pushed as far as the CDNs! - they just don't expose access to it it via the web interface. iPlayer via Virgin cable has UHD for a fair few shows now. By "fair few" you mean hardly any... I’ve seen quite a few in UHD through Virgin cable. They tend to do them in UHD when the show suits it I List9/11 Inside the President's War RoomAttenborough's Life in ColourAttenborough's Wonder of SongBlue Planet IIChloeDoctor Who Revolution of the DaleksDynastiesThe Earthshot Prize Repairing Our PlanetThe Girl BeforeThe Green PlanetHis Dark MaterialsLife and Death in the WarehouseMoodPeaky Blinders, Series 6 A Perfect PlanetThe Pursuit of LoveThe ResponderRidley RoadSeven Worlds, One PlanetShowtrialThe TouristThe TrickA Very British ScandalVigilWonders of the Celtic DeepAs part of our trial, we also provided live streams in Ultra HD for both the UEFA Men's Euro 2020 and Wimbledon 2021. A lot of those shows have come around in the last few months which shows that the BBC are getting into gear with UHD now. Netflix might have the most UHD shows, but a not insignificant amount of them are documentaries which consist of interviews and archive footage. Someone sitting in a chair talking to a camera in UHD doesn't have the "wow" factor and wouldn't look much different in 1080p but still counts towards their UHD might not be the greatest video player, but it's not that way because the government owns it. ITV isn't government owned but the ITV Hub is absolute crap. 1 Nobody on here has made the case for Channel 4’s has the $1bn is neither here nor I see the BBC bashers are out in force. Based on my sample of New York parents at the school gate, the BBC has a very good reputation, albeit niche. Probably on the same level as HBO who are also struggling against the giants, but continue to make fantastic content. It's post like this that demonstrate why the BBC and Channel 4 are basically doomed. Merely observing reality broadcast TV has already lost the young is "BBC bashing". No amount of good will in New York will save them, as those New Yorkers contribute essentially nothing to the BBC and Channel 4 like the BBC a lot, mainly radio and the website, but you have to have your head in the sand to think it has a future as it is. I’m very interested in ideas for how the BBC could change, but the dominant tone on here is by people who dismiss the notion of public service or state owned broadcasting I just ignore them as to my mind bad faith my post was intended as a rebuttal to the idea that the BBC has no brand, nothing more. My core argument is always the licence fee is in the modern world a totally unenforceable and b totally outdated idea I have to pay a licence to watch telly, even if I don't watch the 4 BBC channels I only want to watch Sky Sports. The debate is then how do you replace the licence fee. There are a range of options. Agree with personally think the BBC TV should split into two; the legacy analogue channels, and a digital first player. The legacy analogue channel should focus on the basics, ie BBC1 and 2. The digital first player arm let’s call it BBC Digital should strike a deal to partner with HBO+. Together they would have an astonishing library of content and could compete legitimately in the US and perhaps other places. In the UK, BBC Digital would be available for a streaming fee equal to the current license fee, which should otherwise be scrapped. 0 Nobody on here has made the case for Channel 4’s has the $1bn is neither here nor I see the BBC bashers are out in force. Based on my sample of New York parents at the school gate, the BBC has a very good reputation, albeit niche. Probably on the same level as HBO who are also struggling against the giants, but continue to make fantastic content. It's post like this that demonstrate why the BBC and Channel 4 are basically doomed. Merely observing reality broadcast TV has already lost the young is "BBC bashing". No amount of good will in New York will save them, as those New Yorkers contribute essentially nothing to the BBC and Channel 4 like the BBC a lot, mainly radio and the website, but you have to have your head in the sand to think it has a future as it is. I’m very interested in ideas for how the BBC could change, but the dominant tone on here is by people who dismiss the notion of public service or state owned broadcasting I just ignore them as to my mind bad faith my post was intended as a rebuttal to the idea that the BBC has no brand, nothing more. My core argument is always the licence fee is in the modern world a totally unenforceable and b totally outdated idea I have to pay a licence to watch telly, even if I don't watch the 4 BBC channels I only want to watch Sky Sports. The debate is then how do you replace the licence fee. There are a range of options. Here is my recommendation1. Split off the BBC and Channel 4 as non-profit enterprises, freeing them from government interference and maintaining their mission Have a public broadcasting fund paid for by general taxation. Allow the BBC, Channel 4 and any other broadcaster to bid for funds from this pot program by program against public service criteria of educating and informing the public. Have it strongly overseen for impartiality. 3. Have a separate fund for developing new artistic stuff like comedies, drama Allow the BBC to get automatic rights to these pots in a declining share over next 5 years while they Return the World Service and local language services to the Foreign Office, funded by those funds. 0 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? From experience of visiting friends, they use naughty streams which seem to go down every 3 minutes. We subscribe to Sky and BT here too and the stability and quality of the service is worth every penny compared to the alternative. 1 eek Posts 20,327 As for BBC Three it is a million miles better than most of the shite on cable. There are dozens of channels which I never watch - absolute rubbish full of endless ads. The crap cable / satellite channels are dead men walking too. Sky should be as worried as anybody about how the world of media is problem is BBC Three isn't better in the minds of the target demographic than the array of other options...that's why the yuff aren't watching BBC Three. The people saying well I think BBC Three is alright, you aren't the demographic, its teenagers through to mid 20s, and they ain't watching when it was on iPlayer and they ain't watching now its back on linear tv. They are - why do you think Sky Glass exists - and why do you think there are Sky Netflix combo deals that give you Netflix for virtually nowt. 0 As for BBC Three it is a million miles better than most of the shite on cable. There are dozens of channels which I never watch - absolute rubbish full of endless ads. The crap cable / satellite channels are dead men walking too. Sky should be as worried as anybody about how the world of media is problem is BBC Three isn't better in the minds of the target demographic than the array of other options...that's why the yuff aren't watching BBC Three. The people saying well I think BBC Three is alright, you aren't the demographic, its teenagers through to mid 20s, and they ain't watching when it was on iPlayer and they ain't watching now its back on linear tv. They are - why do you think Sky Glass exists - and why do you think there are Sky Netflix combo deals that give you Netflix for virtually nowt. Well yes and they are also investing billions in original programming / production facility at Elstree. They also have the NowTV service for a slightly different segment of the market. They are adapting, unlike some other players ;- The big thing for Sky is the issue of footy rights. That is why a huge number of people have Sky even though it is very expensive. One other issue might well be that HBO Max could come to UK and that is basically the Sky Atlantic channel gone. 0 Looks like I might be right about increasing secularism in Turkey. Yay“The headscarf is slippingNot long ago women in Turkey fought to cover their hair, yet now it seems the headscarf has fallen out of favour. Seventeen years into Erdoganʹs rule, some things are floundering – including the assumption that Turkish society is becoming increasingly conservative. By Christiane Schlotzer” was 2019. I suggest it has accelerated since then 0 And there are huge pictures of Atatürk EVERYWHEREHmmmmm 0 Disney+ is terrible lol 1 The UI is just terrible, it's slow and unreliable. 0 Mobile crematoria in MariupolMayor of Mariupol Vadim Boychenko said today that Russian mobile crematoria have started operating in the to him, tens of thousands of people could have died in Mariupol and the cremation, "covering up the traces of crimes". 0 Anyway! It's Local Elections Nominations Day! Hoop Hoop!In Havering, we have Havering Residents Association vs Hornchurch & Upminster Independents in one ward, and Havering Residents Association vs Indepdendent Harold Hill Resisdents association in another, and Harold Wood Residents vs Havering Residents Harold Wood in a politics are just bonkers. I reckon Harold Wood 'call me Harry' will walk it. 1 It's striking how much support Boris Johnson is getting for his comments on trans issues from people who are not his natural supporters. This one is typicalannettepaceyOh god oh no someone I loathe just made a really good point. Still could never bring myself to vote for the bastard but this is what happens when Labour turn their backs on women and leave an open goal labourlosingwomen No, I've been told by PB experts that saying women have cocks won't hurt Labour. I think ultimately their hatred of Boris / Brexit will still have these people don their Polly Trademarked nose pegs and vote against Boris. Yes but people who say things like that aren't the target - it's the floaters who will play safe. Your approach is just to ignore CoL and the economy in general then? Labour tried that 0 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? From experience of visiting friends, they use naughty streams which seem to go down every 3 minutes. We subscribe to Sky and BT here too and the stability and quality of the service is worth every penny compared to the alternative. For some reason I still get BT Sport for free included in my BT broadband. If that's a mistake, please don't tell BT! 0 Boris "Bucha shots do not look far short of genocide" - I wonder how considered those words are. Rwanda 1994 was all "Don't mention the G word" because if it's there, there is a duty to prevent it on parties to the 1948 convention. 0 What's changed since 2016 then? Other than Labour being handed its arse in a large number of seats, like... Never trust a got to do this from a position of principle. Did we agree that we would put this decision out to the public for a vote? Yes. Did we agree that we would accept the result? Yes. Have we got to accept the result? Yes. So, the first position is a matter of principle. Having done this, having got a result, we've got to accept it. Simply saying Well, it's better for us electorally 'if we do this or do that’ doesn't help. - Sir Keir Starmer, 2017if we need to break the impasse, our options must include campaigning for a public vote – and nobody is ruling out Remain as an option. - Sir Keir Starmer, 2018 I don’t find those statements particularly now a much harder task find two contradictory Boris statements. I dare you! Wow, you really think that having a second vote with the defeated Remain option back on the ballot paper is "accepting" the result? OK then! It's clear that a significant part of the voting public recognises that Brexit was a Bad Idea. And that a decreasing number think it was actually a good one. 1 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. 1 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? I knit, which is an activity well-suited to combining with watching TV I did a lot of sock-knitting during Euro I can't believe it's not 2020, but I don't know where you get the time to watch so much sort of half using our Netflix subscription, and there are the occasional thing that we watch on BBC, but we're partway through a number of series and I can't imagine adding a sports subscription and another streaming terms of sport, I listen to TMS for Test cricket and the County Championship starting again tomorrow! is on free streams available via the ECB or the County websites. What other sport is there? 0 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? From experience of visiting friends, they use naughty streams which seem to go down every 3 minutes. We subscribe to Sky and BT here too and the stability and quality of the service is worth every penny compared to the alternative. Indeed. The naughty streams are absolute rubbish. Watching sport is one of life’s great pleasures. Why ruin it by bringing your own sandwiches to the restaurant? 0 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. I’m not saying you’re wrong, in fact you’re right - but Sherlock was a big hit around the not so much? 2 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? From experience of visiting friends, they use naughty streams which seem to go down every 3 minutes. We subscribe to Sky and BT here too and the stability and quality of the service is worth every penny compared to the alternative. For some reason I still get BT Sport for free included in my BT broadband. If that's a mistake, please don't tell BT! Funny that - I use Virgin Media, and have never subscribed to BT Sport - but at the start of this football season, it suddenly appeared live on my channels and I've had a freebie ever since. 1 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...very well shot, high quality cast, but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... 1 Mobile crematoria in MariupolMayor of Mariupol Vadim Boychenko said today that Russian mobile crematoria have started operating in the to him, tens of thousands of people could have died in Mariupol and the cremation, "covering up the traces of crimes". Just the phrase “mobile crematoria” is chillingly grotesque. Nauseating echoes of the mobile gas chambers of the Holocaust 1 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? From experience of visiting friends, they use naughty streams which seem to go down every 3 minutes. We subscribe to Sky and BT here too and the stability and quality of the service is worth every penny compared to the alternative. For some reason I still get BT Sport for free included in my BT broadband. If that's a mistake, please don't tell BT! I pay £ for BT sport on top of my BT broadband 0 The issue with Channel 4 being publicly owned is… There are far better things for Governments to be doing? Wouldn't you rather that Government indulged in something relatively benign and cost-free like Channel 4, and at a decent arms length, than deciding the Cabinet is full of mini-nuke and fracking experts who need to have their opinions heard? 0 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. Elementary is absolutely fantastic, my favourite TV show after Father Ted. 2 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... Peaky Blinders also turned to shit halfway through season 2 and never recovered 0 Anyway! It's Local Elections Nominations Day! Hoop Hoop!In Havering, we have Havering Residents Association vs Hornchurch & Upminster Independents in one ward, and Havering Residents Association vs Indepdendent Harold Hill Resisdents association in another, and Harold Wood Residents vs Havering Residents Harold Wood in a politics are just bonkers. Damn you, I now have 500 Miles stuck in my head... 2 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... Peaky Blinders also turned to shit halfway through season 2 and never recovered I never got into it. But it is undeniably popular, but no way to leverage a hit in the modern media landscape. 10 years for 36 sodding episodes.....Even George RR Martin creates stuff faster than that. It looks like there will be a 4 year gap between Bodyguard S1 and S2....can you imagine Apple, Netflix, Amazon, HBO, etc doing that to a show that got 11 million viewers. 0 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... Peaky Blinders also turned to shit halfway through season 2 and never recovered Maybe you could try and be on it, you like to make things up as you go along 0 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... Peaky Blinders also turned to shit halfway through season 2 and never recovered I never got into it. But it is undeniably popular, but no way to leverage a hit in the modern media landscape. The first series was absolutely brilliant. The visuals remained great throughout and I loved the mad choice of music But the plots jumped the shark way too early. Shame 0 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? I knit, which is an activity well-suited to combining with watching TV I did a lot of sock-knitting during Euro I can't believe it's not 2020, but I don't know where you get the time to watch so much sort of half using our Netflix subscription, and there are the occasional thing that we watch on BBC, but we're partway through a number of series and I can't imagine adding a sports subscription and another streaming terms of sport, I listen to TMS for Test cricket and the County Championship starting again tomorrow! is on free streams available via the ECB or the County websites. What other sport is there? My point is exactly that I don’t watch that much TV, I cannot believe how anyone could watch so much as some people on PB seem to claim, therefore the Netflix and Prime subscriptions are barely worth is great, and I listen to it, but as a cricket fan presumably you actually want to watch Test match cricket too? I find the idea that purported sports fans refuse to pay a round of drinks a month to watch professional sport absolutely baffling. 0 Conservatives don't seem like CONSERVING national institutions! Names of parties do not while I dont trust their motivation for doing it I'm surprised at the idea channel 4 is an institution. 0 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. I’m not saying you’re wrong, in fact you’re right - but Sherlock was a big hit around the not so much? Wouldn't surprise me if that was rights issues. Elementary was I think shown on Sky. Was Sherlock on BBC Worldwide? 0 Catching up with a Ukrainian family that has arrived in our village through the Homes scheme…. One is a teacher of Ukrainian language and is now remotely teaching kids back in Ukraine, lockdown style, which seems cool… 3 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? I think that's about where I am. Prices are getting close to not worth it when they are still trying to all have their own services. 1 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...very well shot, high quality cast, but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... Thought Peaky Blinders was pretty awful. I managed seven episodes of the hot mess and barely plausible storylines before I binned it. It looks great, the VFX are excellent. But the characters are almost universally unsympathetic, the plots rushed, and the screenplay do people see in it? 0 Anyway! It's Local Elections Nominations Day! Hoop Hoop!In Havering, we have Havering Residents Association vs Hornchurch & Upminster Independents in one ward, and Havering Residents Association vs Indepdendent Harold Hill Resisdents association in another, and Harold Wood Residents vs Havering Residents Harold Wood in a politics are just bonkers. Damn you, I now have 500 Miles stuck in my head... 500 miles? That's a lot of leaflets to the driveways are very very long. 0 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. I’m not saying you’re wrong, in fact you’re right - but Sherlock was a big hit around the not so much? Perhaps not, but ran for 7 years and it is better, not just that theres more of it. The first season in particular - did a far better job showing how a Holnes/Watson dynamic could realistically develop when one is such an arse. 1 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? From experience of visiting friends, they use naughty streams which seem to go down every 3 minutes. We subscribe to Sky and BT here too and the stability and quality of the service is worth every penny compared to the alternative. For some reason I still get BT Sport for free included in my BT broadband. If that's a mistake, please don't tell BT! I pay £ for BT sport on top of my BT broadband You are paying for his ;- 0 Mr Pointer,Last time, I haggled with Virgin, they threw in BT Sport for free. I'd forgotten about it until I checked the sport options one Saturday and discovered Liverpool playing live. I assumed it was for one year only but it seems not. 1 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...very well shot, high quality cast, but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... When you say “people consume content at an incredible rate”, do you mean “I consume content at an incredible rate”? 0 Another warmed-over Trotskyist pimping for Mother-Fucking Russia. 3 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? From experience of visiting friends, they use naughty streams which seem to go down every 3 minutes. We subscribe to Sky and BT here too and the stability and quality of the service is worth every penny compared to the alternative. For some reason I still get BT Sport for free included in my BT broadband. If that's a mistake, please don't tell BT! Funny that - I use Virgin Media, and have never subscribed to BT Sport - but at the start of this football season, it suddenly appeared live on my channels and I've had a freebie ever since. That’s because with certain Virgin packages it’s cheaper to have it than not have in my experience. 0 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...very well shot, high quality cast, but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... When you say “people consume content at an incredible rate”, do you mean “I consume content at an incredible rate”? No. Its a fact. Netflix paid absolutely insane amounts of money to have Friends and Seinfeld in recent years, because they explain people eat up all the original content so quickly they need these shows that people will watch many many times over in order to keep them on the platform between new releases of the blue chip is despite, Netflix making 60 shows in the UK last year alone, with 10,000 people working on them. Sky Productions are planning on doing the same. The demand for content is immense. 0 We have been regularly assured by the Brexit tendency that food security does not matter, and the international market will sort it all interesting to see how this plays out, as it is perhaps sub optimal timing for a significant shakeup in the UK farming sector. 0 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...very well shot, high quality cast, but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... When you say “people consume content at an incredible rate”, do you mean “I consume content at an incredible rate”? No. Its a fact. Netflix paid absolutely insane amounts of money to have Friends and Seinfeld in recent years, because they explain people eat up all the original content so quickly they need these shows that people will watch many many times over in order to keep them on the platform between new releases of the blue chip is despite, Netflix making 60 shows in the UK last year alone, with 10,000 people working on them. Sky Productions are planning on doing the same. The demand for content is immense. Scary. People need to get a bloody life. 0 Just listened to Boris on Sky on transgender and partygate debates..On transgender he said He does not agree children should face conversion therapy as this should be a parental decisionHe said that male transgender women should not compete in women's eventsHe believes women should have safe space in toilets, prisons etcOn partygate He said he will not comment before the police have concluded their investigations at which time he will make a statement on the subject On transgender he seems to have made a sensible statement On partygate is he thinking if he receives a FPN will he confound everyone and decide to give notice to the conservative party to commence the election of his successor at which time he will stand downThis is a betting site and as improbable as it seems it is not impossible On transgender, let us pick apart those viewsHe does not agree children should face conversion therapy as this should be a parental decision- If by 'conversion therapy' he means puberty blockers and/or cross-sex hormones then it's an interesting one. When do you need to use puberty blockers to be effective? In childhood cross-sex hormones are not available until post-16 anyway, afaikHe said that male transgender women should not compete in women's events- Not sure quite what that means - transgender women still with male anatomy? For me, I'd base decisions on whether there is likely to be an advantage beyond normal variation - for many sports of strength/stamina there may well be, certainly for anyone who reached adulthood as a man. But for a birth male who got puberty blockers pre-puberty and cross-sex hormones at 16? Maybe there is still an advantage, I do not believes women should have safe space in toilets, prisons etc- Indeed. What about transgender women? Are they safe in male toilets/prisons etc? I'm not necessarily taking the opposite viewpoint, although it may appear that way. But these are complicated issues that don't have quick soundbite answers. Should a Gillick competent 13 year old female who wants to be a male be denied treatment that would prevent breast growth until they are 16 and already have breasts? On the other hand, is a 13 year old really able to choose treatment that might make them infertile for life?Complicated issues, without easy answers. 6 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...very well shot, high quality cast, but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... When you say “people consume content at an incredible rate”, do you mean “I consume content at an incredible rate”? No. Its a fact. Netflix paid absolutely insane amounts of money to have Friends and Seinfeld in recent years, because they explain people eat up all the original content so quickly they need these shows that people will watch many many times over in order to keep them on the platform between new releases of the blue chip is despite, Netflix making 60 shows in the UK last year alone, with 10,000 people working on them. Sky Productions are planning on doing the same. The demand for content is immense. Scary. People need to get a bloody life. With phones, iPads, all of a sudden you have a device to watch this content anywhere at anytime. So people do so on their commute, in the gym etc. As well as obviously in front of the telly. 0 Nobody on here has made the case for Channel 4’s has the $1bn is neither here nor I see the BBC bashers are out in force. Based on my sample of New York parents at the school gate, the BBC has a very good reputation, albeit niche. Probably on the same level as HBO who are also struggling against the giants, but continue to make fantastic content. It's post like this that demonstrate why the BBC and Channel 4 are basically doomed. Merely observing reality broadcast TV has already lost the young is "BBC bashing". No amount of good will in New York will save them, as those New Yorkers contribute essentially nothing to the BBC and Channel 4 like the BBC a lot, mainly radio and the website, but you have to have your head in the sand to think it has a future as it is. I’m very interested in ideas for how the BBC could change, but the dominant tone on here is by people who dismiss the notion of public service or state owned broadcasting I just ignore them as to my mind bad faith my post was intended as a rebuttal to the idea that the BBC has no brand, nothing more. My core argument is always the licence fee is in the modern world a totally unenforceable and b totally outdated idea I have to pay a licence to watch telly, even if I don't watch the 4 BBC channels I only want to watch Sky Sports. The debate is then how do you replace the licence fee. There are a range of options. Agree with personally think the BBC TV should split into two; the legacy analogue channels, and a digital first player. The legacy analogue channel should focus on the basics, ie BBC1 and 2. The digital first player arm let’s call it BBC Digital should strike a deal to partner with HBO+. Together they would have an astonishing library of content and could compete legitimately in the US and perhaps other places. In the UK, BBC Digital would be available for a streaming fee equal to the current license fee, which should otherwise be scrapped. It's not a bad the analogue channel should also perhaps be free to view worldwide digitally along with bits of 'Digital'. 0 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? From experience of visiting friends, they use naughty streams which seem to go down every 3 minutes. We subscribe to Sky and BT here too and the stability and quality of the service is worth every penny compared to the alternative. For some reason I still get BT Sport for free included in my BT broadband. If that's a mistake, please don't tell BT! Funny that - I use Virgin Media, and have never subscribed to BT Sport - but at the start of this football season, it suddenly appeared live on my channels and I've had a freebie ever since. That’s because with certain Virgin packages it’s cheaper to have it than not have in my experience. Maybe, but I've had Virgin for 16 years, with Sky Sports, but it was only last year that they gave me BT Sports 'free' without telling me - I discovered it by chance. 1 Anyway! It's Local Elections Nominations Day! Hoop Hoop!In Havering, we have Havering Residents Association vs Hornchurch & Upminster Independents in one ward, and Havering Residents Association vs Indepdendent Harold Hill Resisdents association in another, and Harold Wood Residents vs Havering Residents Harold Wood in a politics are just bonkers. Damn you, I now have 500 Miles stuck in my head... No Peoples Front for the Liberation of Harold Wood? 1 TV is going through a period of huge change. What does any enterprise need to weather and indeed thrive in a period of such change? They need a stable foundation, a secure financial footing, which allows them to innovate and evolve in response. Now is the worst time to start tinkering with those foundations. They don't have "a stable foundation, a secure financial footing, which allows them to innovate and evolve in response." They have a pittance to spend when compared to their new competitors. I've mentioned it before but Amazon are spending roughly as much on the first season of their Lord of the Rings series as the BBC spends on drama in an entire year. British broadcasters have never faced such well funded competition before, and unlike in the past those mostly US competitors can access the UK market directly. Netflix and other streamers have massively bigger budgets, but way more watch the BBC. Looks to me like the BBC is a model of efficiency we should be celebrating then! Except a nobody actually fully knows for certain Netflix viewership as they never release it and b there is an absolutely huge demographic split. Oldies continue to watch linear tv, but middle aged and younger people don't at anywhere near the same amount. Media is having the same revolution as the globalisation of every other industry over the past 20-30 years, and many seem to want to try and repeat the mistake of those industries holding onto this yes but we are the best mantra, no need to change. There is a common fallacy in political thinking. It goes like this... Something needs to change. This is something. So we should do BBC and Channel 4 are well aware that the broader industry is changing and changing rapidly. The BBC and Channel 4 are Dorries thinks that privatising Channel 4 is the change that is needed. Dorries didn't even know how Channel 4 was funded some months ago. Why should I believe that Dorries now knows better what change is needed than the people in Channel 4 and the wider industry, who largely don't think this is the change that is needed?I don't think Government automatically knows best. I think there are plenty of contexts where Government should step back and let enterprises get on with the job. My original comment was exactly this.....I linked to an article was saying yes aware of the elephant in the room, but there is never any suggestion of how to adapt. Its instant we can't change this way because yadda yadda yadda. Ok, and so how do you suggest changing, and there is tumbleweed. How are BBC or CH4 adapting? BBC Three coming back, genius. 4k / HDR still in "beta" for years and the system failed on iPlayer for Euro final. Sky / BT / Netflix have had 4k for years now. Channel 4 isn't going to turn it into Netflix. How is Nadine Dorries's change going to solve the disappearance of linear TV? Channel 4 one.....Waffle waffle buzz word waffle....no mention 4k, no mention HDR, "Using a more viewer-centric approach to inform activity and decisions across Channel 4".."Rolling out personalisation features on All 4, including smarter recommendations"Fk me, they are like 10 years behind the rest of the normal world is that if their "future goals" for 2025. Just more evidence their tech is just garbage. How is Nadine Dorries's change going to solve the disappearance of linear TV? AGAIN.....nobody is answering my question.....any suggestion of change is met we no we can't do that / that would be bad....so what are the proposals. You linked to their plans, and its a joke. Buzz word salad and the some vague realisation that Machine learning exists and that perhaps in 3 years time they might have a basic recommendation service, which Netflix, Spotify etc etc etc have had from their inception and which the likes of TikTok absolutely smash. This is not so forgive us all if there's more focus on the political aspects. The change that has been proposed by Dorries is to sell Channel 4, to take it out of public ownership, to dismantle Thatcher's Dorries's change solve the challenges you tell us about? those very significant challenges still exist is an important point, but they are somewhat tangential. That is just trying to side step the issue. There is zero evidence the BBC or CH4 have an real idea how to adapt to this changed world. I posted a link earlier showing how way more people watch the BBC than Netflix. Channel 4 was tied with Netflix, IIRC, despite spending far less. So, the world has changed and the BBC and Channel 4 are doing more than say "changed world" above. You are probably going to reply talking about trajectory and future changes to come. You probably should've said "changING world".If you want to talk about the future, explain how a privatised Channel 4 or BBC would adapt better. ITV is privatised and is doing a terrible job of adapting! And we circle right back around to my initial point. Those who want to fight against this privatisation need to propose a coherent plan for the future, and the key problem is they never do. It is classic Sir Humphrey, we can't do that reply, look at what we did 30 years ago. So either the government will get its way or they will U-Turn, the CH4 supporters will celebrate initially and I bet they don't adapt. Donald Trump once suggested injecting bleach to cure COVID-19. Sometimes ideas suggest by politicians are stupid and it's fine to say they're wrong, without providing a detailed alternate solution to all other problems. Today, yes, but their entire business model is being destroyed. Anyone who knows anything understands that what is true today might not be the same in the they embrace the future, or they die. That their erstwhile "defenders" of the status quo want to defend it as being able to make money via commercials today isn't a really good endorsement for it adapting for the future. The problem is neither the Beeb or C4 see this or accept this. They just want to cling on to the past model irrespective of how the market is changing. But this is industry is notorious for it. Be it home taping, VHS video, Napster. Any technological change or innovation is resisted. Even the migration from black and white to colour TV was a problem. This is just nonsense. The BBC and C4 are very aware of how the industry is changing. Neither is proposing doing nothing. Both have embraced technological change and innovation. What they are opposing is a specific change in how they are funded. Given no-one in this thread can explain why these changes in funding model would solve any of the global challenges in broadcasting, I sympathise with their a political ideology called conservatism that recognises the value of established institutions and suggests we should be wary of tinkering with the fundamentals. It often champions this country's success stories. It used to have a lot of MPs in Parliament. I wonder where they all went? You have to be careful here as it's easy to get things mixed C4 doesn't change it's funding model - it changes it's is a bigger problem as it does need to change it's funding model but how you do that has been an issue for over 20 years and no one has come up with a solution... Ownership and funding are linked though as the funding model that C4 has been relying upon is dying - fast. And so either it evolves under ownership that is ready to adapt to that and generates alternative funding sources - or the owners will be liable for losses or winding it up when the funding dries the state isn't best placed to generate the alternative funding sources - and left to its own devices under its current ownership their plans for the future are embarrassing at best, so an alternative ownership is needed to get the funding in place for the future. The two are intrinsically linked. How can you say it's dying when they are making a profit right now, in the present, in the teeth of Netflix/Amazon. Ah the future, streaming, you say. But you could as easily say that people will get sick of paying a subscription for a streaming service only 3% of which they ever a subscription model and ad-funded are of course commercial models and there may well be room for both in the market so I'm not sure why you say "Commercial TV has failed". And as I noted above, there is probably a large number of people who would put up with adverts in order to get "free" against government ownership of TV companies I am by all means but your strange arguments around "Commercial TV" and the streaming services does your case no good if you conflate as eek notes, ownership and business models. By "commercial" TV I was quite clearly referring to, as I had already pointed out, TV funded by commercials as opposed to owners need to find another business model as C4's is dying. Yes its running a profit today, I don't deny that, but its not going to in five or ten years time if nothing like somebody in 2005 saying that Blockbuster is making a profit from its video stores so it has no reason to consider changing. Basically you have just copied and pasted the Government defence rationale for privatising C4 as proposed is the point? 1 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...very well shot, high quality cast, but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... When you say “people consume content at an incredible rate”, do you mean “I consume content at an incredible rate”? No. Its a fact. Netflix paid absolutely insane amounts of money to have Friends and Seinfeld in recent years, because they explain people eat up all the original content so quickly they need these shows that people will watch many many times over in order to keep them on the platform between new releases of the blue chip is despite, Netflix making 60 shows in the UK last year alone, with 10,000 people working on them. Sky Productions are planning on doing the same. The demand for content is immense. Scary. People need to get a bloody life. With phones, iPads, all of a sudden you have a device to watch this content anywhere at anytime. So people do so on their commute, in the gym etc. As well as obviously in front of the telly. Yeah tried watching on my commute. Awful, trying to watch a drama on a small screen surrounded by businesspeople. These people should try reading a book! 0 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? From experience of visiting friends, they use naughty streams which seem to go down every 3 minutes. We subscribe to Sky and BT here too and the stability and quality of the service is worth every penny compared to the alternative. For some reason I still get BT Sport for free included in my BT broadband. If that's a mistake, please don't tell BT! Funny that - I use Virgin Media, and have never subscribed to BT Sport - but at the start of this football season, it suddenly appeared live on my channels and I've had a freebie ever since. That’s because with certain Virgin packages it’s cheaper to have it than not have in my experience. Maybe, but I've had Virgin for 16 years, with Sky Sports, but it was only last year that they gave me BT Sports 'free' without telling me - I discovered it by chance. Did you upgrade your broadband speed?I mean, you might not have done. These things do seem rather random! 0 George Galloway has been given a special designation by Twitter 11 - Does Alaska's Special Election Create An Opening For Sarah Palin's Comeback? . . For its part, the Alaska Democratic Party is lining up behind Anchorage Assembly member Chris Constant, although other notable Democrats are running, including state Rep. Adam Wool; former state Rep. Mary Sattler Peltola, a Yup’ik Eskimo; and indigenous activist Emil Notti, an 89-year old Koyukon Athabascan who lost to Young in the 1973 special election for this seat. Meanwhile, a handful of independent “nonpartisan” or “undeclared” in Alaska parlance candidates are also running Al Gross, an independent who lost the 2020 Senate race as the Democratic nominee; former Republican state Rep. Andrew Halcro; former Alaska assistant attorney general and garden columnist Jeff Lowenfels; and even a North Pole city councilor who changed his name to Santa Claus. Did we mention there are a lot of candidates?There’s been no public polling of the special primary yet, but we do have one data point on the special general election that includes Palin A Change Research poll funded by 314 Action Fund, which spent heavily to boost Gross’s campaign in 2020, found Palin and Gross running neck and neck at around 35 percent after respondents’ choices were reallocated via ranked-choice voting. To be sure, the poll only included four candidates Palin, Gross, Revak and one other Republican who ultimately chose not to run, but even so, the poll does illustrate how Palin could win in a ranked-choice general election. At the same time, though, it underscores how ranked-choice voting could make for an incredibly close contest, possibly because of Palin’s poor standing among Alaska voters writ last wrinkle in the Alaska race is that the special general election will coincide with the regular primary for the November general election, which means we will find out who won the special election at the same time as we discover which four candidates advanced to the regular general election. Most of the high-profile contenders, including Palin, have filed or say they intend to file for the regular contest they have until June 1 to do so. In other words, most of the major candidates will essentially be campaigning for two elections at once in the coming months. Still, at least a few notable names — Coghill, Halcro and Notti, for instance — only plan to run in the special, so it’s not out of the question that the special election winner will not be among the candidates who advance to the regular general election. . . . 0 To be fair he does have a subsatntial claim on the DumbAss region. 5 If you want Ukraine to be able to recapture territory, then we need to give them tank, artillery long range missiles, as well as the small Ames and hand held missiles we are already giving them. 0 . George Galloway has been given a special designation by Twitter Some with the skill needs to photoshop this, so that Putin's 2nd-favorite tool is wearing a 0 eek Posts 20,327 It's easy to get first call on actors by paying absolute top dollar. Which is what Apple TV have done here. 1 I've recently been watching 'Elementary' on Prime; CBS's take on Sherlock Holmes, with Jonny Lee Miller as Sherlock and Lucy Liu as I compare it with the BBC's awful 'Sherlock', it shows where the BBC often goes wrong. Elementary takes the Sherlock Holmes idea and thoroughly modernises it. They made 154 episodes over nine years, allowing meaningful plot and character development. The BBC's Sherlock is all about the *star*. The plotlines are ludicrous, and they made just 13 episodes in seven years, allowing little plot or character development. Also Jonny Lee Miller is a much better actor than Benedict Cumberbatch. People consume content at an incredible rate now, so if you have a hit you need to leverage that. The BBC are still stuck in the approach of we will make it at our own time, fitting around the stars who are doing us a favour. That's why Peaky Blinders took 10 years to make 36 episodes, Taboo with Tom Hardy, they can't make a 2nd season, McMafia got scraped even before the whole Russia stuff, no Bodyguard 2nd seasons for another few years, etc etc they sign people for several seasons and its one season per year at this time on the I know some like to argue you get the super high amazing quality if you take BBC approach. Personally, I don't buy that, but even if you think so, having this we will get to it, when we get to it, just is setting light to money. Slow Horses on Apple+ is shaping up to be very good and is only 6 episodes for a season...very well shot, high quality cast, but I bet you any money, April 2023 Season 2, April 2024 Season 3.... When you say “people consume content at an incredible rate”, do you mean “I consume content at an incredible rate”? No. Its a fact. Netflix paid absolutely insane amounts of money to have Friends and Seinfeld in recent years, because they explain people eat up all the original content so quickly they need these shows that people will watch many many times over in order to keep them on the platform between new releases of the blue chip is despite, Netflix making 60 shows in the UK last year alone, with 10,000 people working on them. Sky Productions are planning on doing the same. The demand for content is immense. Scary. People need to get a bloody life. Why? People seek out entertainment of different forms, some will go heavier on the tv/streaming than others. 0 Just listened to Boris on Sky on transgender and partygate debates..On transgender he said He does not agree children should face conversion therapy as this should be a parental decisionHe said that male transgender women should not compete in women's eventsHe believes women should have safe space in toilets, prisons etcOn partygate He said he will not comment before the police have concluded their investigations at which time he will make a statement on the subject On transgender he seems to have made a sensible statement On partygate is he thinking if he receives a FPN will he confound everyone and decide to give notice to the conservative party to commence the election of his successor at which time he will stand downThis is a betting site and as improbable as it seems it is not impossible On transgender, let us pick apart those viewsHe does not agree children should face conversion therapy as this should be a parental decision- If by 'conversion therapy' he means puberty blockers and/or cross-sex hormones then it's an interesting one. When do you need to use puberty blockers to be effective? In childhood cross-sex hormones are not available until post-16 anyway, afaikHe said that male transgender women should not compete in women's events- Not sure quite what that means - transgender women still with male anatomy? For me, I'd base decisions on whether there is likely to be an advantage beyond normal variation - for many sports of strength/stamina there may well be, certainly for anyone who reached adulthood as a man. But for a birth male who got puberty blockers pre-puberty and cross-sex hormones at 16? Maybe there is still an advantage, I do not believes women should have safe space in toilets, prisons etc- Indeed. What about transgender women? Are they safe in male toilets/prisons etc? I'm not necessarily taking the opposite viewpoint, although it may appear that way. But these are complicated issues that don't have quick soundbite answers. Should a Gillick competent 13 year old female who wants to be a male be denied treatment that would prevent breast growth until they are 16 and already have breasts? On the other hand, is a 13 year old really able to choose treatment that might make them infertile for life?Complicated issues, without easy answers. I'd agree with all that, and would only add that I'm uncomfortable with the concept of 'parental decision'. I wouldn't trust quite a lot of parents to make an informed decision. And that includes parents who may encourage their youngsters to change gender/sex inappropriately, as well as the other way round. 2 Just listened to Boris on Sky on transgender and partygate debates..On transgender he said He does not agree children should face conversion therapy as this should be a parental decisionHe said that male transgender women should not compete in women's eventsHe believes women should have safe space in toilets, prisons etcOn partygate He said he will not comment before the police have concluded their investigations at which time he will make a statement on the subject On transgender he seems to have made a sensible statement On partygate is he thinking if he receives a FPN will he confound everyone and decide to give notice to the conservative party to commence the election of his successor at which time he will stand downThis is a betting site and as improbable as it seems it is not impossible On transgender, let us pick apart those viewsHe does not agree children should face conversion therapy as this should be a parental decision- If by 'conversion therapy' he means puberty blockers and/or cross-sex hormones then it's an interesting one. When do you need to use puberty blockers to be effective? In childhood cross-sex hormones are not available until post-16 anyway, afaikHe said that male transgender women should not compete in women's events- Not sure quite what that means - transgender women still with male anatomy? For me, I'd base decisions on whether there is likely to be an advantage beyond normal variation - for many sports of strength/stamina there may well be, certainly for anyone who reached adulthood as a man. But for a birth male who got puberty blockers pre-puberty and cross-sex hormones at 16? Maybe there is still an advantage, I do not believes women should have safe space in toilets, prisons etc- Indeed. What about transgender women? Are they safe in male toilets/prisons etc? I'm not necessarily taking the opposite viewpoint, although it may appear that way. But these are complicated issues that don't have quick soundbite answers. Should a Gillick competent 13 year old female who wants to be a male be denied treatment that would prevent breast growth until they are 16 and already have breasts? On the other hand, is a 13 year old really able to choose treatment that might make them infertile for life?Complicated issues, without easy answers. He is also mixing two definitions of 'conversion therapy'.His government is still legislating to ban it ie the coercive practice of attempting to persuade homosexual individuals that they aren't homosexual in respect of homosexuality, at the same time as abandoning their previous promise to do so also in respect of transgender about non-coercive clinical treatment of transgender individuals as "conversion therapy", at the same time as the government has ditched the proposed ban on coercive activities is singularly bad faith argument. 2 The BBC is great. The Ukraine war underlines its value. Arguments about the licence fee are used as a fig leaf by people who object to the BBC for various political reasons. 3 Note how the second thing he brings up is his follower count. People are so second thing to note is that of the things he lists only not working for Russian media would be relevant - being the leader of a party and spending time in parliament wouldn't mean he couldn't be a paid russian shill. Heck, you can be a former leader of a country and do TwitterSupport I am not “Russian State Affiliated media”. I work for NO Russian media. I have 400,000 followers. I’m the leader of a British political party and spent nearly 30 years in the British parliament. If you do not remove this designation I will take legal action 0 Anyway! It's Local Elections Nominations Day! Hoop Hoop!In Havering, we have Havering Residents Association vs Hornchurch & Upminster Independents in one ward, and Havering Residents Association vs Indepdendent Harold Hill Resisdents association in another, and Harold Wood Residents vs Havering Residents Harold Wood in a politics are just bonkers. Damn you, I now have 500 Miles stuck in my head... No Peoples Front for the Liberation of Harold Wood? no, The Harold Wood Liberation Front. Not the Peoples Front for the Liberation of Harold wood. Splitters! 0 We have been regularly assured by the Brexit tendency Boy, they really started running out of titles for the Bourne francise, didn't they? 3 I have binned Apple TV two shows I watch; I have binned Disney+ zero shows; I subscribe to Netflix and Prime which just about justify their fees but it’s close.Beeb is still decent value for best value for money by a country mile are Sky Sports and BT Sport. I watch tons of live sport and they have a lot. I find it baffling that purported sports fans don’t subscribe to them. How do they watch any sport? From experience of visiting friends, they use naughty streams which seem to go down every 3 minutes. We subscribe to Sky and BT here too and the stability and quality of the service is worth every penny compared to the alternative. For some reason I still get BT Sport for free included in my BT broadband. If that's a mistake, please don't tell BT! I pay £ for BT sport on top of my BT broadband You are paying for his ;- Bt sport and Sky sports are the only reason I subscribe to BT and Sky But then in my time I have played football, cricket, golf, tennis, canoeing and sailing and have had a lifetime love of sport 1 The BBC is great. The Ukraine war underlines its value. Arguments about the licence fee are used as a fig leaf by people who object to the BBC for various political reasons. I have no "political" reason for getting rid of the licence fee, I just think it's wrong I can't watch Sky or Channel 4 because I don't want to pay for the BBC. 2 thing that is always striking from these defence pieces about BBC / CH4, is a it is all historic, 30-40 years ago it did x and b they acknowledge the elephant in the room, but never provide any suggestion about what to do about spends £30m a year on new productions, Netflix spends £1bn a year and 10,000 people work on their productions in the UK. Sky are committing billions to UK production, with a massive project at Elstree . What Film4 spends in a year on total film budget, Netflix spends on 3 episodes of one of their blue chip shows. I am all ears for suggestions. But no change isn't going to work. We see constantly now, the best talent goes to Netflix, Amazon. Its a bit like remembering when Wimbledon FC used to match up against the best in the Premier League, plucky upstarts on shoe string budget, and saying they can do it again....but now you either need billions and / or incredibly innovative owners like at Brentford. The flaw with this argument is why should we believe a privatised Channel 4 will become a second Netflix when no rationale at all is put forward for the change, beyond Nadine wants this? Channel 4 has a niche in its current form. What will the privatised version offer? Who gives a fuck. The government owning C4 is like the government owning W H Smith. What’s the point? Sell it while it is still worth something. We need the money But then why can't it make a profit for the Government and ease the burden on the taxpayer? Why shouldn't the BBC do the same? I don't really have a problem with public ownership. If it does make a profit and could be made to make even more profit - a pre-requisite for any company wanting to buy it, why then sell it? Why not keep it and keep getting the golden eggs? 1 Just listened to Boris on Sky on transgender and partygate debates..On transgender he said He does not agree children should face conversion therapy as this should be a parental decisionHe said that male transgender women should not compete in women's eventsHe believes women should have safe space in toilets, prisons etcOn partygate He said he will not comment before the police have concluded their investigations at which time he will make a statement on the subject On transgender he seems to have made a sensible statement On partygate is he thinking if he receives a FPN will he confound everyone and decide to give notice to the conservative party to commence the election of his successor at which time he will stand downThis is a betting site and as improbable as it seems it is not impossible On transgender, let us pick apart those viewsHe does not agree children should face conversion therapy as this should be a parental decision- If by 'conversion therapy' he means puberty blockers and/or cross-sex hormones then it's an interesting one. When do you need to use puberty blockers to be effective? In childhood cross-sex hormones are not available until post-16 anyway, afaikHe said that male transgender women should not compete in women's events- Not sure quite what that means - transgender women still with male anatomy? For me, I'd base decisions on whether there is likely to be an advantage beyond normal variation - for many sports of strength/stamina there may well be, certainly for anyone who reached adulthood as a man. But for a birth male who got puberty blockers pre-puberty and cross-sex hormones at 16? Maybe there is still an advantage, I do not believes women should have safe space in toilets, prisons etc- Indeed. What about transgender women? Are they safe in male toilets/prisons etc? I'm not necessarily taking the opposite viewpoint, although it may appear that way. But these are complicated issues that don't have quick soundbite answers. Should a Gillick competent 13 year old female who wants to be a male be denied treatment that would prevent breast growth until they are 16 and already have breasts? On the other hand, is a 13 year old really able to choose treatment that might make them infertile for life?Complicated issues, without easy answers. It seems complicated to some but Boris laid out a clear position that I suspect is the position of many 2 The BBC is great. The Ukraine war underlines its value. Arguments about the licence fee are used as a fig leaf by people who object to the BBC for various political reasons. To an extent. But I'm not convinced that's the whole of it. Personally I deeply value the news output and think, whilst there are other news outlers out there, that its worth paying for a national broadcaster. But I find it hard to justify in the modern age about paying for all the entertainment aspects it seeks to provide. It's not particularly good compared to anything else, is it any more unique? The back catalogue is a great boon, to be sure, and there is stuff made that can be sold, but is that worth paying for?Either way, it gets attacked from left and right at times, though more on the right, so I think the current set up just cannot hold. 0 The BBC is great. The Ukraine war underlines its value. Arguments about the licence fee are used as a fig leaf by people who object to the BBC for various political reasons. To an extent. But I'm not convinced that's the whole of it. Personally I deeply value the news output and think, whilst there are other news outlers out there, that its worth paying for a national broadcaster. But I find it hard to justify in the modern age about paying for all the entertainment aspects it seeks to provide. It's not particularly good compared to anything else, is it any more unique? The back catalogue is a great boon, to be sure, and there is stuff made that can be sold, but is that worth paying for?Either way, it gets attacked from left and right at times, though more on the right, so I think the current set up just cannot hold. The right seem to prefer that we get our news and entertainment from oligarchs albeit of various flavours. If anything has had its day it is that. 2 The BBC is great. The Ukraine war underlines its value. Arguments about the licence fee are used as a fig leaf by people who object to the BBC for various political reasons. To an extent. But I'm not convinced that's the whole of it. Personally I deeply value the news output and think, whilst there are other news outlers out there, that its worth paying for a national broadcaster. But I find it hard to justify in the modern age about paying for all the entertainment aspects it seeks to provide. It's not particularly good compared to anything else, is it any more unique? The back catalogue is a great boon, to be sure, and there is stuff made that can be sold, but is that worth paying for?Either way, it gets attacked from left and right at times, though more on the right, so I think the current set up just cannot hold. The right seem to prefer that we get our news and entertainment from oligarchs albeit of various flavours. If anything has had its day it is that. Sky is American owned 0 I didn't know it was all out elections in St Dems are therefore probably certain to win a huge majority anyway with the Tories winning a few seats around London Colney and Harpenden. So this is one council where the Tories will definitely see large seat losses. 0 Even the most ghastly regime can't be held responsible for the acts of individuals under its command. I suspect there are Russian soldiers out there trying not to blindly kill. I certainly don't see Putin as responsible for their acts. 0

doctor who revolution of the daleks streaming vf